Like most of you, I’m getting a little sick of the stories in the media about the glories of Castro’s Cuba. I’m reminded of a line in the Greatest Television Miniseries of All Time: “Everybody’s loved when he’s dead.” Fidel ain’t dead but he’s getting eulogies.
Well, I don’t love someone just because he’s dead. When Fidel kicks the bucket, people should dance on his grave the way they would dance on Stalin’s. Fortunately, many others are immune to this “Viva Castro!” bullshit:
Writing in The New Statesman, British parliamentarian John McDonnell, the Right Honorable Gentleman from 1968, offers high praise for Cuban communism and demonstrates a level of credulity not seen since John Reed vacationed in Moscow. But don’t mention Moscow, because, as McDonnell bizarrely writes, “unlike Stalin’s Russia there have never been any Cuban gulags.” What’s not to like, he asks, about a country that provides “free prescriptions, free care for the elderly, free university education.”
So again, the health and education canard returns. What all of these pols and pundits lazily presume is that if the state of Cuban health care and education have markedly improved on Castro’s watch, surely the situation was dire during the final years of the Batista dictatorship.
Well, not exactly. In 1959 Cuba had 128.6 doctors and dentists per 100,000 inhabitants, placing it 22nd globally—that is, ahead of France, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Finland. In infant mortality tables, Cuba ranked one of the best in the world, with 5.8 deaths per 100,000 babies, compared to 9.5 per 100,000 in the United States. In 1958 Cuba’s adult literacy rate was 80 percent, higher than that of its colonial grandfather in Spain, and the country possessed one of the most highly-regarded university systems in the Western hemisphere.
Cuba improved, as have most countries, on some of these indices in the years since the revolution. As reason Contributing Editor Glenn Garvin points out, “countries like Costa Rica, Panama, and Brazil have posted equal gains in literacy during the same time period without resorting to totalitarian governments.” (For more reason coverage over the years on Cuba and Castro, go here.)
This is precisely the point: Punctual trains and spiffy highway networks hardly mitigate the horror of dictatorship. Such “advances,” like the illusory gains of the Cuban Revolution, are best achieved through policies that promote economic and political freedom. You would think, almost 20 yeas after the fall of the Berlin Wall, that journalists would understand that.
Oh, and as for the canard the Cuba never had gulags? Lies.
Four dissidents freed this week after five years in inhumane conditions in a Cuban prison have revealed the dark side of Fidel Castro’s regime.
The four - José Gabriel Ramón Castillo, Omar Pernet Hernández, Alejandro González and Pedro Pablo Álvarez - described regular beatings, humiliation and arbitrary punishment with long periods of solitary confinement in cramped cells with cement beds.
Arriving in Spain to be reunited with their families, they exposed the routine abuse of political prisoners which marked Castro’s five decades in power.
The four were part of a group of 75 dissidents who were jailed in 2003 by Castro’s regime in a move which caused an international outcry. The official reason given for their release was “health reasons”.
...
Mr Castillo, 50, a journalist who wrote articles critical of the regime, told The Sunday Telegraph: “It was terrible. It was like being in a desert in which sometimes there is no water, there is no food, you are tortured and you are abused.
“This was not torture in the textbook way with electric prods, but it was cruel and degrading. They would beat you for no reason even when you were in hospital.
“At other times they would search you for no reason, stripping you bare and humiliating you. There was one particular commander at a jail in Santa Clara who seemed to take delight in handing out beatings to the prisoners.”
Mr Castillo, who claims he was denied proper medical aid for diabetes and heart problems, added: “We are nothing more than a reflection of the human cost of the fight being waged by the Cuban people.”
While the dissidents tasted freedom, 58 of the original 75 jailed for long terms in 2003 are still behind bars.
It is estimated another 250 political prisoners languish in Cuban prisons. Mr Castillo was not hopeful that the departure of El Comandante from the helm of power would bring great changes.
...
Omar Pernet, a steel worker also in his fifties, was jailed for being an opposition activist, suffered an accident while being moved from one jail to another in 2004.
He also suffered lung problems in jail, a broken leg, a broken collar bone.
He said he was kept in solitary confinement in a cell measuring four metres square with a cement bed.
In all, he has spent 21 years behind bars for opposing the regime. Mr Pernet was jailed for 20 years after being accused of aiding the US secret services - a charge he says was trumped up.
Why do we go on and on about Castro? Because Fidelphilia is one of the symptoms of what I call the Credulous Left—the faction of the left wing that believes anything bad they hear about America and anything good they hear about our enemies. From Noam Chomsky on, they will deny Killing Fields, proclaim Saddam’s Iraq a paradise, praise Cuban health care and condemn the killing of terrorists. Moore, in going to Cuba and proclaiming everything he saw wonderful, has become a standard-bearer of the Credulous Left. And with every truth that leaks out about Fidel’s Cuba, we can see just how credulous he is.
Please bear with me here… I have a torn-up shoulder and can’t type very well at the moment, but when I saw this story I had to tap this out for the site. Apparently, Michael Moore has a new mission… he wants to bring Fidel Castro to the Academy Awards:
Moore’s Oscar-nominated documentary on the health care industry ends with a trip to Cuba, where he seeks care for a group of Nine-Eleven responders who’ve had health problems.
Moore told AP Television he’s been trying to figure out how to get Castro into the Oscars, and Castro’s resignation as leader of Cuba comes with great timing. Moore says now Castro can come to L.A. and be Moore’s guest at the Academy Awards and maybe even get to give an acceptance speech—as long as he keeps it under five hours.
As most of you might know by now, Fidel Castro recently “resigned” as the President of Cuba and handed over the governmental reigns to his brother, Raul. Raul Castro has in fact been running Cuba for some time now due to Fidel’s health issues, so this isn’t a monumental change for the Cuban people, who remain horrifically oppressed, starved, and completely controlled by the governmental machine. I’ve written extensively about Cuba for Moorewatch in the past, so my passionate hatred for Castro and all he and his government have done to destroy the people of Cuba is no secret. Indeed, I have openly stated that Moore’s trip to Cuba in “Sicko” made him a Castro collaborator and demonstrated that he, on some level, supports Castro’s despicable treatment of the Cuban people.
Moore’s statements about bringing Castro to the Academy Awards proves most every allegation I have made towards him in regards to his trip and attitude towards Cuba. The fact that Moore wishes to bring a Communist dictator, a mass murderer, a man who systematically slaughtered tens of thousands of his own people in order to establish his totalitarian government is not only offensive to me as an American but a huge slap in the face to all Cubans and Cuban-Americans who have fought their way out of Cuba over the last fifty years. Clearly Moore has no regard whatsoever for the feelings of the thousands of Cuban-Americans and Cuban refugees whose lives and families have been destroyed by this monster, and this cavalier attitude just disgusts me to no end. It seems that whatever will bring Moore press is a good thing, no matter who it might hurt or offend.
Once again… shame on you, Michael Moore. Shame on you indeed.
UPDATE: I just thought of something that really makes the idea of Moore bringing Castro to the Academy Awards this year even *more* repugnant, if that’s even possible.
As some of you will know, I published a long series of articles about the extraordinarily talented dissident Cuban author Reinaldo Arenas. In the year 2000, director Julian Schnabel brought the story of Reinaldo Arenas to the silver screen with his film “Before Night Falls”, an adaptation of Arenas’ memoirs by the same name. In the movie Arenas was played so well by the talented Javier Bardem that he won an Oscar nomination for his performance.
How does this movie made nearly a decade ago connect to Moore’s desire to bring Castro to the Oscars this year? Simple, really. This year, Julian Schnabel is up for Best Director for his work in “The Diving Bell and the Butterfly”, and of course Javier Bardem is the favorite to take home the Best Actor in a Supporting Role statue for his astounding performance in “No Country for Old Men”. So… Moore would like sit Castro just rows away from the man who brought Reinaldo Arenas’ story to the world and the man who immersed himself so deeply in the tortured soul of Reinaldo that he won an Oscar nomination for his work. Can you imagine the effect having Castro so close to them would have on both of these men, on what should be one of the happiest nights of their lives? How selfish and thoughtless could Moore possibly be?
What Our Mr. Lee calls the Greatest Magazine on the Planet has the goods on a realdocumentary about Cuba:
In June 2000, this magazine published a cover story on Hollywood’s “missing movies.” These were not, alas, films that had been neglected by inattentive archivists or spurned by Ted Turner’s guardians of classic film. The target of this search-and-rescue operation, wrote critic Kenneth Lloyd Billingsley, were those tales of injustice, those triumphs of the spirit that Hollywood had little interest in producing. Long under the spell of radical writers such as Dalton Trumbo and Clifford Odets, Hollywood was “a town that welcomed Daniel Ortega of the Sandinista junta but never took up the cause of a single Soviet or Eastern European dissident.”
Almost 20 years after the fall of the Berlin Wall, the entertainment industry is still sensitive to charges of Cold War jingoism, though the spread of hipster Buddhism has necessitated the occasional dramatization of China’s occupation of Tibet. A spate of recent films—none of them produced in Hollywood—is also providing a more nuanced picture of the Cold War, one that eschews simple moral equivalence in favor of the dystopian reality of the Eastern Bloc.
...
Even Hollywood’s strange love affair with the Cuban revolution, recently evidenced by Oliver Stone’s Comandante and Walter Salles’ saccharine salute to Che Guevara, The Motorcycle Diaries, is at long last showing signs of abating. A few years ago, New York painter/director Julian Schnabel memorably upbraided Castro in his film Before Night Falls, a portrait of the gay writer Reinaldo Arenas, imprisoned by the communist government for both his aberrant politics and sexuality.
Now, from first-time director Cristina Khuly, comes Shoot Down, a brilliantly rendered and scrupulously even-handed documentary revisiting the 1996 Cuban downing of two civilian planes over international waters, both piloted by Miami-based exiles from the group Brothers to the Rescue. Khuly, a 37-year-old sculptor, is the niece of shoot-down victim Armando Alejandre Jr.
An event soon overshadowed by the saga of Elian Gonzales, the attack on the unarmed Brothers to the Rescue planes is now largely forgotten outside Miami. And despite the smokescreen of misinformation presented by Castro and his foreign enablers, the facts of the story are rather straightforward and grimly characteristic of a totalitarian regime.
As three Brothers to the Rescue planes approached Cuban territory, the lead plane, piloted by the group’s founder Jose Basulto, briefly breached Cuban airspace. While the planes were searching for refugees in the water, officials in Havana, tipped off by a mole in the Brothers leadership, scrambled Soviet-made MiG fighter planes to knock the planes out of the sky. Basulto’s plane managed to escape. When the other two were vaporized by Cuban missiles, both were flying over international waters.
The mole, former Cuban Air Force MiG pilot Juan Pablo Roque, is a chilling reminder of the Stasi-like tactics of the Cuban secret police. Roque infiltrated Brothers to the Rescue by insinuating himself into the exile community—going so far as to write a book for the Cuban American National Foundation detailing his escape from the island—and marrying a local woman as cover. The day before the deadly flight, Roque declined an invitation to participate in the mission and informed his wife that he would be away on business. A day later, he reappeared on Cuban state television to denounce the Brothers as “terrorists” of the empire.
I don’t expect MIchael Moore to make do an expose of Cuban society in a film about healthcare. I do expect that he might mention, maybe in passing, that Cuba is something less than a socialist paradise.
The first post I wrote on my own blog that got any attention was on Hollywood’s refusal to take either communism or Islamism. Nice to know that not everyone is afraid.
This is a must-read if you have any doubt about how bad it is in Cuba for the average Cuban. Moore’s rose-colored camera lens in Sicko told you a flat-out lie.
The money quote, IMHO:
“We learned that the Cuban system is nothing but misery, moral mendacity and abuse. The system simply smothers you. And yet this revolution (with it"s Che Guevara banners) has sold itself to the youth of the world as a paradigm of equality, liberty and national liberation. And the leaders of the government that governs my country (Spain) simply refuse to come out and call this place a dictatorship. The Cuban people’s personal aspirations seemed completely mutilated. I"ve never felt such anguish about a nation and a people in my life. if I were a Cuban I"d certainly be on a raft.”
Read the whole thing. It’s worth your time.
P.S. - If you’re not reading Babalu Blog regularly, you should be.
On October 10th, Hannity & Colmes ran an amazing piece about the REAL health care that REAL Cubans receive in their own country. It is a disturbing video that shows the real life hospital conditions that average Cubans must endure in order to obtain even the most basic health care. For the first time on American television the ugliness, despair, and abject poverty of the Cuban health care system has been shown for what it truly is. It is a direct rebuttal to everything that Michael Moore portrayed in “Sicko” and further validates the arguments I made against him in my articles about the Cuban dissident writer Reinaldo Arenas, in particular my summation to the series in Part 4. Watch it and see the truth about real Cuban health care for yourself:
If that isn’t disturbing enough for you, there’s more. Cuban Truth has quite a few additional videos that fully demonstrate the horror of living under the thumb of Castro and the abject horrors of Cuban health care. These videos are quite disturbing, so please be warned if you follow that link and choose to view them.
After watching this piece that Hannity & Colmes ran I have only one thing to say. Michael Moore, you have purposely deceived the world with your portrayal of Cuba in “Sicko”. You have turned your back on the suffering of the Cuban people in order to further your own personal agenda without a thought of what damage your actions might have on a nation of desperate and impoverished people. And, worst of all, you have collaborated with Castro and his regime in order to do it. You have proven yourself to be a liar and a collaberator and I hope that now America can see you for what you truly are. Shame on you, Michael Moore. Eternal shame on you for what you have tried to do to the people of Cuba.
I would like to give a hat tip to Val Prieto and Babalu Blog for letting us here at Moorewatch know about this broadcast. I would also like to personally thank Mr. Prieto and everyone at Babalu for the outstanding work they have done and continue to do to expose the truth about Cuba and for doing everything they can to aid the Cuban cause. Mr. Prieto, I salute you, sir.
UPDATE: Val Prieto has put up the second part of the Hannity & Colmes piece on Babalu Blog along with some commentary. Here is the second half of the Hannity & Colmes piece:
Thank you once again to Val Prieto and Babalu Blog for their amazing work and commitment to the freedom of Cuba. :)
I was innocently basking in the wonderful sight of Cuba’s UN delegation flouncing out of the room because Bush said some mean wotten things about Pappa Fidel, when Reason brings this nonsense to my attention. It’s a long scientific paper (and behind a firewall in any case) but the abstract is something that will make Michael Moore drool. We’ll be sure to see him crowing about this soon.
Cuba’s economic crisis of 1989–2000…
Whoa whoa whoa! Wait a minute. Wait a minute. Wait a minute. Economic crisis of 1989-2000? An eleven year economic crisis?! That’s impossible on the Island Paradise. Note the year it started. 1989. The year communism fell and Fidel stopping getting handouts from the Commies. So, in a very real sense, they have been in an economic crisis since 1959.
Anyway, resuming our discussion:
Cuba’s economic crisis of 1989–2000 resulted in reduced energy intake, increased physical activity, and sustained population-wide weight loss.
Most people call that “starvation”, but I’ll let them stick to the technical terms.
The crisis reduced per capita daily energy intake from 2,899 calories to 1,863 calories. During the crisis period, the proportion of physically active adults increased from 30% to 67%, and a 1.5-unit shift in the body mass index distribution was observed, along with a change in the distribution of body mass index categories. The prevalence of obesity declined from 14% to 7%, the prevalence of overweight increased 1%, and the prevalence of normal weight increased 4%.
Add the numbers to see what they’ve left out—the population of underweight people increased at least 2%. As a commenter at Reason pointed out, the Jews lost a lot of weight during the Holocaust, too. I would add that so did the Ukranians during Stalin, the Irish during the Potato Famine, Africans during various civil wars, Cambodians under Pol Pot and . . . Christ, I can’t go on with this. You get the idea.
During 1997–2002, there were declines in deaths attributed to diabetes (51%), coronary heart disease (35%), stroke (20%), and all causes (18%).
Of course, we always believe numbers that come out of Communist countries. Like the way the Soviets used to claim they had suburbs. Granted, some of those suburbs consisted of log cabins and mud huts, but ... they were suburbs! Those people were below the urb. In many cases, six feet below it.
Not reported? How much of an increase there was in death by suicide and starvation. Note carefully that the overall death rate dropped less than the death rate from stroke, heart disease and cancer - so something must have increased. For most people, you’ve got to live a while before you get a stroke, heart disease or cancer. I have no doubt that the millions of Africans murdered during the Congo War had decreased rates of stroke, heart disease and cancer as well.
An outbreak of neuropathy and a modest increase in the all-cause death rate among the elderly were also observed.
Hmm. So just one decade of this back-breaking-labor-and-starvation plan has already shorted and worsened the lives of Cuba’s seniors. That’s nice.
These results suggest that population-wide measures designed to reduce energy stores, without affecting nutritional sufficiency [!!], may lead to declines in diabetes and cardiovascular disease prevalence and mortality.
So there you have it. Michael Moore was right. Cuba has pointed the way! All we need to do is reduce ourselves to such abject total poverty that our 15-year-old daughters are prostitutes. We need to all quit our computer jobs and go to manual labor (all except Mikey of course. Every Golgafrinchan paradise needs documentary film makers). We need to all get the food literally ripped out of our hands ... and we’ll all be healthier!
I think Michael, for opening the discussion of how wonderful Cuba’s healthcare system is, deserves, at minimum, a Nobel Prize. I’ll see if they have a category for fatuous self-importance.
I’m going to go off on a tangent here, but one I think is critical to how we think about socialized medicine. If we get MikeyMooreCare, forced diets will be coming, one way or another.
I’m sure there a lot of health Nazis out there who are reading this and nodding their heads. Our national obssession with obesity—and in particular, the useless Body Mass Index—has warped our perception of everything. (BMI is useless—the healthiest Americans are those who are slightly overweight).
The Health Nazis are already saying our government should force us to diet and exercise. And now, they’ve got the data to back it up! Ok, maybe we don’t need extreme poverty. But coercive methods (denying care to the obese, a fat tax, etc.) would work! Cuba is healthier!
But even we accept these bullshit statistics, Cuba’s is not healthier. You can’t consider this thing in a vacuum, unless your last name happens to be “Moore”.
Consider this: some time back, the NYT ran an excellent article about how seniors in the US today are healthier than seniors have ever been. 100 years ago, if you were lucky enough to reach 60, you were almost certaintly in bad shape and probably bed-ridden. The astonishing improvement is attributed, not to better adult care, but to better early care - prenatal care, early immunization and, yes, better nutrition in the first few years of life.
One particular fact struck me. Children who were in the womb during the great Flu Pandemic, compared to children who came before or after, lived shorter lives and had more health problems. Just their mothers catching the damned flu was enough to affect them for the rest of their lives. It is an inescapable fact of life that good prenatal and early childhood care can set someone up for a lifetime of better health.
The Health Nazis look at Cuba, see weight loss and say, “Hooray!”. I’m sure Michael Moore will joke, “Boy, I sure wish I lived in Cuba! Ha! Ha!” But the negative effects of this wonderful beneficial glorious economic crisis may not show up for half a century, when the children of Cuba grow up to be unhealthy, crippled adults.
Now, forget Cuba for a moment. Forget weight loss and BMI. Concentrate on the principle. We have serious researchers proclaming that starvation was a good thing. Does it really stretch the imagination to think that, once our healthcare is in the government’s hands, some idiot won’t convince them ... well maybe not that starvation is good. But how about that stomach stapling should be mandated? Or even craziers ideas like mammograms cause brain cancer? Or that cell phones should be banned? That reading blogs stunts your growth? That masturbation makes you blind? Can’t you imagine Congress debating the merits of aromatherapy and magnets?
OK, maybe we won’t get crazy ideas like that. But right now we have people who want to mandate the HPV vaccine. And as much as I hate to side with the anti-vaccinators, what happens if we find out that it has long-term fertility effects? It wouldn’t be the first time a supposedly safe OB/Gyn drug caused defects twenty years down the road.
If the government controls healthcare, decisions will not be made by the Wisdom of Crowds but by policy wonks. And policy wonks have an amazing tendency to embrace unproven ideas that later turn out to be bad ones.
“Hey, our methods made Americans skinnier! Hooray! Oh, but now we have a bunch of crippled seniors. D’oh!”
The reason conservatives like me oppose government control is because it limits the damage of dumb ideas and bad policy. If I fall for some whack-job unscientific health nonsense or embrace a seemingly good idea (like vaccinating my daughter against HPV) that later turns out to be bad, the only person hurt is myself and my family. When the government embraces bad ideas—we all get hurt. And the history of government is that they come up with far more bad ideas than good ones.
If you haven’t seen the 20/20 clip of John Stossel’s partial interview with Moore, take a moment and watch. Stossel keeps asking him questions relating to Cuba. Stossel shows that the data about Cuban life expectancy (and indeed, anything about Cuba) come straight from Castro’s propaganda factories. He then asks Moore why we should trust what Cuba has to say, which is a completely legitimate point. My quick transcript of the exchange follows.
STOSSEL: Why believe what they say about how long they live?
MOORE: Not to direct your interview here, but you know Cuba’s a red herring. Let’s stick to Canada and Britain and this stuff because I think these are legitimate arguments that are made against the film and against the so-called idea of socialized medicine and I think you should challenge me on these things and I’ll give you my answer.
STOSSEL: (Voiceover) So, next week, that’s what we’ll do.
Now, as Jim rightly asks below, if Cuba is a “red herring” then why does Moore feature it so prominently in his film? I didn’t really get what point Moore was trying to make with the red herring remark. It was only tonight, when watching this 60 Minutes report about the dust at Ground Zero that I figured it out.
Moore, despite his obvious love for and undying devotion to Fidel Castro and his regime, knows that Cuba is a despicable place. Moore doesn’t want Stossel mentioning healthcare in the context of Cuba because Moore thinks that by focusing on Cuba the audience will be manipulated into dismissing the idea of socialized medicine by tying it to Fidel Castro. In other words, don’t use the viewer’s predisposition to be opposed to Castro to attack socialized medicine. Talk about Britain and Canada rather than Cuba, since Cuba carries a built-in negative emotional response, and Moore wants to debate socialized medicine on its own merits.
In and of itself I think that’s a completely fair point.
Tonight, though, watching the 60 Minutes piece, it dawned on me that this is exactly what Moore did when he took the 9/11 rescue workers to Cuba. After all, according to Moore our country is littered with the corpses of people who died in the streets while evil healthcare corporations reaped massive profits. Surely he could have taken a far more random sampling of people to Cuba with him. Why did he take a boatload of 9/11 rescue workers to Cuba?
Simple. 9/11 rescue workers come with an extremely powerful sympathetic response built in. We all saw them risking life and limb on that pile of rubble, showing the world the best of America. Moore wanted the audience to form a bond with his passengers, so he chose 9/11 workers. When a brewery wants to sell beer they show guys at parties with gorgeous women. The implied message is that if you drink this beer, women who look like this will want to sleep with you. It’s associating two disparate items and allowing the viewer to generate the connection in their mind. In Moore’s case, 9/11 workers were “turned away” by the evil corporate system, but they were taken care of by Cuba. What does 9/11 have to do with Cuba’s healthcare system? Nothing at all, but the implied message is clear: Cuba’s socialist government will treat 9/11 heroes better than our evil free market system.
Moore could have just as easily chosen a convenience store worker from Ohio who has been denied foot surgery for two years and has to stand 8 hours a day in pain, but he didn’t. He carefully selected the one group of people toward whom, no matter where you stand on the political spectrum, you will immediately feel sympathy. Moore wanted to use that sympathy to promote socialized medicine. But when Stossel did exactly the same thing by using Cuba’s negative image to attack socialized medicine, all of a sudden it’s a “red herring” and not germane to the discussion.
See how this works? See how skillfully Moore can manipulate his audience? If he had taken a boat full of ex-cons who were being denied healthcare, small time crooks who had paid their debt to society, would you feel the same emotional pull that you do towards 9/11 workers? Of course not. Moore knows this, which is why he chose his passengers from a very select group, even though any group of uninsured sick people would make exactly the same point.
Moore is a master manipulator. When he noticed Stossel tying Cuba’s healthcare system to Cuba’s government—a completely legitimate point—he tried to divert the discussion away from the undeniable truth about his idol El Presidente and the misery of life under socialism. In his film Moore paints the healthcare debate as the evil and heartlessness of capitalism versus the purity and goodness of socialism. Not one time does he concede that there are some things our system does much better than theirs. It was an entirely emotional argument. When he does Stossel’s interview, however, he wants to direct it so that it is framed solely as a healthcare debate on the merits, devoid of emotion.
As I have said on this blog before, Moore had an excellent opportunity to create a film that showed the positives and negatives of socialized and private systems, then suggest ways in which we could improve our system by incorporating some aspects of the systems in other countries. He had the chance for his debate solely on the merits, free of red herrings. Instead he decided to create an infomercial for socialism.
Emotional manipulation is Moore’s stock in trade, and he’s sure as hell not going to let some reporter tread on his territory.
Fidel Castro, the Cuban president, has predicted that Democratic candidates Hillary Clinton and Barrack Obama will team up to win the 2008 US presidential election.
“The word today is that an apparently unbeatable ticket could be Hillary for president and Obama as her running mate,” the ailing leader wrote in an editorial column in Granma, the Cuban Communist Party’s newspaper.
It’s a natural endorsement, considering either Clinton or Obama would bring Cuba’s healthcare system to America.
If you’re not a regular reader of Radley Balko blog, you should be. I’d been preparing a post on why our lifespan and infant mortality rates aren’t that big a concern. But like most mediocre writers, I’m just as happy to quote a better writer than write for myself:
The discrepancy between the U.S. and Andorra (the world leader in life expectancy) isn’t much. It’s less than six years. That doesn’t seem like anything to get panicky about. Good for Andorrans. All twelve of them.
I don’t know how much I’d trust the data coming from some parts of the world. Cuba, for example. Does anyone really think Cuba’s putting out honest numbers about its health care system? Hell, I don’t trust public health data when it comes from the U.S. government.
As I recall, the Soviet Union claimed a lifespan close to that of the US at the height of their power. After Communism fell, the figures mysteriously dropped by a dramatic amount. Never forget your Lenin: truth only exists when it serves the Revolution (he’d love Michael Moore).
The United States counts all births as live if they show any sign of life, regardless of prematurity or size. This includes what many other countries report as stillbirths. In Austria and Germany, fetal weight must be at least 500 grams (1 pound) to count as a live birth; in other parts of Europe, such as Switzerland, the fetus must be at least 30 centimeters (12 inches) long. In Belgium and France, births at less than 26 weeks of pregnancy are registered as lifeless. And some countries don’t reliably register babies who die within the first 24 hours of birth. Thus, the United States is sure to report higher infant mortality rates.
Read the whole thing. Over at my own blog, I use the phrase “Numbers in the Dark” to describe numbers quoted by pundits without context or, frequently, in deliberately misleading terms. Hell, some numbers, like the three million homeless we supposedly had in the 80’s, are just plain made up. (The phrase itself comes a wonderful short story by Italo Calvino). As a scientist, I have an instinct for seeing when numbers are being manipulated to say things they aren’t.
Life expectancy and infant mortality are very much numbers in the dark. We assume that all countries compiles the numbers the same way (false) and with absolute honesty (also false). They’re not completely useless, but you have to know what they mean. Radley Balko does. I hope that a lot of you reading this will.
PLEASE NOTE: This article is part one in a four part series about Cuba and the Cuban writer Reinaldo Arenas. You can find part one of this series here, part two here, and part three here. If you have not read the previous parts of this series, please do so before reading this. The entire series is collected in one post here. Unless otherwise noted, all quotes contained within this series are taken from Reinaldo Arenas’ autobiography “Before Night Falls” translated by Dolores M. Koch.
“For we cannot but speak the things which we have seen and heard.” - Acts, 4:20
Our journey here is almost at an end. There are only a few short years left in the life of the great Reinaldo Arenas, but there is much still to be learned from him and his struggle for freedom. I renew my promise that I made to you at the beginning of this journey now. By the end of this article you will understand why the life and death of Reinaldo Arenas is so important and how Michael Moore and his depiction of Cuba in Sicko connect to this tragic tale.
On May 10th, 1980, Reinaldo Arenas stepped of the deck of the “San Lazaro” and onto the shores of Key West. It was the first time in his life he had ever walked on land not owned and governed by a ruthless dictator. He had virtually no possessions and no money, so it was a lucky turn of fate when Reinaldo met up with the son of a friend from Cuba. The young man took Arenas to a warehouse filled with donations designed to help the Mariel arrivals. Reinaldo received a batch of new clothes, food, and soap. He then met up with Juan Abreu and his dearest friend Lazaro Carilles and was able to contact the Camachos to ensure that his papers were safe. Finally, after so many years of running, hiding and exile, Reinaldo Arenas began to feel human again.
Reinaldo Arenas’ fame and talent had indeed preceded him, and he was invited to speak at a conference at the International University of Florida. Ironically, Herberto Padilla spoke before him; a drunk and stumbling shadow of his former self. Padilla had never been able to recover from the torture and imprisonment which Castro had imposed on him. The sight of this still-broken man fueled Arenas desire to let the world know about the atrocities being committed against artists and homosexuals in Cuba. But when Reinaldo took the stage and began denouncing Castro and his actions in Cuba, the public turned against him and an astonished Arenas was heckled off the stage.
This alarming trend continued as Reinaldo Arenas continued to speak out publicly against Castro’s regime. Arenas’ Mexican publisher told Reinaldo he should have stayed in Cuba and refused to pay him any of his royalties. A similar event happened in Uruguay where Arenas’ publisher not only denounced Reinaldo but published a letter stating that Arenas should be ostracized from the literary world. Despite the fact that Reinaldo Arenas’ works were published and read in dozens of languages all over the globe, he received almost no monetary compensation for it. Even though these events were a rude awakening to the capitalist system, Reinaldo still found it infinitely superior to communism:
None of this surprised me: I already knew that the capitalist system was also sordid and money hungry. In one of my first statements after leaving Cuba I had declared that “the difference between the communist and capitalist systems is that, although both give you a kick in the ass, in the communist system you have to applaud, while in the capitalist system you can scream. And I came here to scream.”
In the summer of 1980 Professor Reinaldo Sanchez offered Arenas a job as a visiting professor at the International University of Florida teaching Cuban poetry. Reinaldo happily accepted this offer while still communing with the plethora of Cuban writers now exiled in Miami. Most of these formerly great writers were living hand-to-mouth or on welfare. Almost none of them could get published. Arenas tried to use his influence to start a publishing house for these talented writers but could not get funding for the project. He was told “literature is not lucrative” – it seemed no one was ready to hear about life under Fidel Castro.
It was after all of this that Reinaldo Arenas realized life in Miami was simply not for him. He found Miami to be a sad caricature of Cuba, a plastic world with no real substance. So when Arenas received an invitation to speak at Columbia University in New York he left almost immediately. Reinaldo fell in love with New York City and its endless sidewalks, trains, theater and nightlife. A friend found him an apartment within blocks of Times Square and, after finishing his course at the University of Florida, Reinaldo Arenas and Lazaro Carilles moved to New York on New Years Eve of 1980.
1981 and 1982 were wonderful years for Reinaldo Arenas in New York. He began writing prolifically and joined a small group of other exiled Cuban writers who had moved to the big city. Just as they used to do in Cuba, the group met and shared their work with each other, eventually leading to the creation of a magazine called “Mariel”. “Mariel” was a defiant publication that spoke about great writers and unmasked the hypocrisy about Cuba, in particular the treatment of homosexuals by Castro. The magazine wasn’t well received and eventually folded, but Arenas felt it was a triumphant effort for it raised important issues about life in Cuba.
Reinaldo Arenas continued insistence on speaking about the horrors occurring in Cuba under Castro began to cost him both professionally and financially. His books were dropped from assigned reading lists at New York University as well numerous other colleges worldwide. This attitude wasn’t limited to Arenas’ work – it affected all Cuban exiled writers:
In exile we have no country to represent us; we live as if by special permission, always in danger of being rejected. Instead of having a country, we have an anti-country…
In the US these types of problems were particularly bad. Reinaldo Arenas found that the vast majority of US liberals were either supportive of Castro or simply overlooked the atrocities being committed in Cuba. Instead of discovering movements to overthrow Castro, Arenas instead found liberal groups wanting to negotiate with the communist dictator and demanding that dissidents remain quiet. To Reinaldo Arenas, who had spent his life fighting, hiding, and being tortured and imprisoned by Castro, this attitude of tolerance and silence was simply unacceptable:
I remember that after I arrived in the United States, a Cuban exile who lived in Washington said to me: “Don’t ever quarrel with the left.” For people like him, to attack Castro’s government was to fight against the left. But after twenty years of repression, how could I keep silent about these crimes? On the other hand, I have never considered myself as belonging to the “left” or to the “right”, nor do I want to be included under any opportunistic or political label. I tell my truth, as does the Jew who has suffered racism or the Russian was has been in the Gulag, or any human being who has eyes to see the way things really are. I scream, therefore I exist.
It took until 1983 for Reinaldo Arenas to obtain a UN document that classified him a refugee. This document allowed him to travel outside the United States and to finally see his good friends Jorge and Margarita Camacho for the first time since 1967. Arenas then embarked on a speaking tour of Europe beginning in Sweden. At the University of Stockholm he gave a lecture in which he simply read sections of the Granma – Castro’s official newspaper – in order to demonstrate what was really happening daily in Cuba. The audience’s response was pointed – they heckled Reinaldo continuously until he was forced to leave the stage. Indeed, Arenas met responses like this in many places along his tour, proving once again that people were either unwilling or unable to deal with the truth about Castro and Cuba.
Between 1980 and 1983 Reinaldo Arenas also appeared in three films: “In His Own Words”, “The Other Cuba”, and “Improper Conduct”. Arenas loved “Improper Conduct” as it was the first film to openly denounce Castro and the persecution of homosexuals in Cuba. The film contained footage of the UMAP concentration camps for gays and interviews with many survivors. The film attracted international attention and won the Human Rights Award in Europe.
During this time period Reinaldo Arenas accomplished a great deal. He wrote or re-wrote six books, was invited to speak at over 40 universities and gave lectures around the world. He was even able to get his mother out of Cuba to New York for a three month visit, sending her home with a huge sack of clothes for his still poor family. These years were among the happiest in Reinaldo Arenas’ life.
For the next few years Reinaldo Arenas devoted his time to fixing and translating his life’s work. He penned a book of essays on Cuban life called “A Need for Freedom” and a book of poetry called “The Will to Live Manifesting Itself”. He had not yet completed the last two novels of his “pentagonia” when Reinaldo became sick with repeated fevers.
In 1987 Reinaldo Arenas was diagnosed with AIDS. Feeling sure his death was now imminent, Arenas bought a plane ticket to Miami – he wanted to die near his beloved sea. Lazaro brought Reinaldo back to New York and checked him into a hospital despite his lack of money or insurance. Given only a 10% chance to live, Reinaldo fought for nearly four months and beat the odds. Upon his discharge from the hospital, although still quite ill, Reinaldo Arenas swore that he would not die until he had completed his life’s work.
Now too weak to type, Reinaldo began dictating his autobiography “Before Night Falls”. In the spring of 1988 Arenas’ novel “The Doorman” was published in France to great critical and commercial success and was one of three finalists for the International Medici Prize. This tremendous success was eclipsed when Reinaldo fell ill again with PCP pneumonia. Despite also developing Kaposi’s sarcoma, phlebitis and toxoplasmosis, he once again beat the odds and lived to continue his work.
Reinaldo Arenas finished “Before Night Falls” in the hospital and began to write “The Color of Summer”, the critical fourth installment in his “pentagonia”. Simultaneously he was revising “The Assault”, the fifth and final piece of the “pentagonia” which had been hurried penned in Cuba. Friends helped to translate Arenas’ longhand and “The Assault” was finally completed. He was also eventually able to complete “The Color of Summer” – thus completing the “pentagonia” – and his poetic trilogy “Leper Colony”. Reinaldo Arenas had finally completed his body of work
In 1988 Reinaldo Arenas flew out to Spain to visit with the Camachos. It was there that Jorge Camacho and Arenas hatched an idea to publish an open letter to Castro requesting he hold a plebiscite similar to the one held in Chile by Pinochet. The idea blossomed, and the letter garnered thousands of signatures, including those of eight Nobel Laureates. The letter was published in newspapers around the world, enraging Castro to no end. Reinaldo hoped that Castro’s reaction to this letter would open the eyes of the world to the atrocities being committed in Cuba and that Cuba would someday soon be free.
In 1990, his body ravaged by disease, Reinaldo Arenas gave several sealed envelopes to his translator and friend Dolores M. Koch with instructions to deliver them at the appropriate time. Shortly after this, Reinaldo Arenas committed suicide, and his letter appeared in newspapers around the world:
Dear friends:
Due to my delicate date of health and to the terrible emotional depression it causes me not to be able to continue writing and struggling for the freedom of Cuba, I am ending my life. During the past few years, even though I felt very ill, I have been able to finish my literary work, to which I have devoted almost thirty years. You are the heirs of all my terrors, but also of my hope that Cuba will soon be free. I am satisfied to have contributed, though in a very small way, to the triumph of this freedom. I end my life voluntarily because I cannot continue working. Persons near to me are in no way responsible for my decision. There is only one person I hold accountable: Fidel Castro. The sufferings of exile, the pain of being banished from my country, the loneliness, and the diseases contracted in exiles would probably never have happened if I had been able to enjoy freedom in my country.
I want to encourage the Cuban people out of the country as well as on the Island to continue fighting for freedom. I do not want to convey to you a message of defeat but of continued struggle and of hope.
Cuba will be free. I already am.
--Reinaldo Arenas
It has been seventeen years since the death of Reinaldo Arenas. It has been seventeen years since he thought Cuba might soon be free. And it has been seventeen more years of persecution, oppression, imprisonment, disease and death for the Cuban people under the ruthless rein of Castro.
Now you have heard the story of Reinaldo Arenas, and what you have heard is indeed the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. Reinaldo’s story is completely verified and vetted. Many of the people who knew him and saw the struggles he endured in Cuba escaped the island as well and have verified his accounts. He has many friends outside of Cuba who are still alive who also corroborate everything he says in his autobiography as fact. Indeed, Lazaro Carilles, Reinaldo’s dearest friend and love, was one of the screenwriters for the movie adaptation for “Before Night Falls”. Reinaldo Arenas’ life is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth about life in Cuba and what Castro has done to the Cuban people.
So then, if Reinaldo Arenas is the truth – and a very moving and heart-wrenching truth at that – what then do we make of Michael Moore’s vision of Cuba in Sicko? According to Michael Moore, Cuba is a happy, sunny place where the people are blissful and everyone receives wonderful care by Castro, who isn’t a man deserving of the hate that America flings at him. How can we juxtapose these two diametrically opposing images?
The simple truth is we can’t and we shouldn’t. Reinaldo Arenas showed us the truth about Cuba. All Michael Moore showed us was a film segment full of lies and political propaganda.
By portraying Cuba as he did in Sicko, Michael Moore refused to acknowledge the life, struggle and death of Reinaldo Arenas and the true horror of life in Cuba. In order to advance his own political agenda Moore shows you the beautiful Cuban countryside, footage of well dressed people, cared for houses and, of course, the wonderful hospital system.
What Michael Moore does NOT show you is the Cuba in which real Cuba citizens are forced to live. These pictures from therealcuba.com show in a dramatic fashion the difference between the Cuba the world is allowed to view and the Cuba that really exists. These pictures, these stories, and the life of Reinaldo Arenas show you the real Cuba, not Michael Moore, who knowingly and willingly turns his back on the real Cuba. Michael Moore shows a complete lack of regard for the struggles of the Cuban people under Castro simply to further his personal agenda against the United States, and that, no matter how you look at it, is wrong.
But what Michael Moore has done is so much worse than a simple and willful denial of reality. By portraying Cuba as he did in Sicko, Michael Moore undoes and undermines all the years of hard and painful work Cubans have spent trying to tell the world about the atrocities that have been committed in Cuba. Reinaldo Arenas spent much of the last ten years of his life, many of them when he was extraordinarily ill, trying to educate the world about the tyranny of Castro. And yet because Michael Moore’s influence is so broad he has the ability to undo and undermine all the progress Reinaldo Arenas and so many countless others have made in trying to educate the world about the real Cuba and the horrors of Castro.
Michael Moore is supposed to be a journalist, a documentarian. His work is supposed to be the truth, but it isn’t. It is full of deception and outright lies about what life in Cuba is like and the reasons America “hates” Cuba. But yet the work of this “journalist” is at complete odds with the truth we know about Cuba, particularly Cuban hospitals. In point of fact, Michael Moore’s so-called “truth” is in direct contradiction to the truth of Reinaldo Arenas and the hundreds of thousands of people who have escaped and continue to escape from Cuba every year.
Reinaldo Arenas had met men like Michael Moore when he arrived in the United States. He called them the “Communist Deluxe” – men and women who tolerated or even admired Castro while eating plates full of food and living free lives, refusing to acknowledge or understand that Cuban people couldn’t live like as they did:
I now discovered a variety of creature unknown in Cuba: the Communist Deluxe. I remember that at a Harvard University banquet a German professor said to me “In a way I can understand that you may have suffered in Cuba, but I am a great admirer of Fidel Castro and I am very happy with what he has done in Cuba.” While saying this the man had a huge, full plate of food in front of him, and I told him: “I think it’s fine for you to admire Fidel Castro, but in that case, you should not continue eating that food on your plate; no one in Cuba can eat food like that, with the exception of Cuban officials.” I took his plate and threw it against the wall.
If ever a man fit the description of “Communist Deluxe”, it would be Michael Moore. But, in fact, Michael Moore is so much worse than just this. He isn’t a man who simply denies or lies about the horrors of real Cuban life under Castro. In order to have filmed what he did in Cuba Michael Moore *MUST* have collaborated directly with Castro and his government. Michael Moore worked directly and willingly with the man – or at the very least, agents of the government - who destroyed the life of Reinaldo Arenas and all Cuban citizens. Michael Moore is a collaborator, pure and simple.
The evidence is undeniable. Entrance into Cuba is next to impossible without official permission. It is illegal for foreigners to film inside Cuba without official permission. One cannot even gain access to Havana Hospital – the hospital Moore displays grandly as an everyday example of Cuban health care – without official permission and, yes, without paying a very capitalist bill for your care.
Look at how wonderfully the government firefighters lined up for Moore’s group in Sicko! Look at how happy the men playing dominos in the street seem to be while extolling the virtues of Castro’s health care system! Never mind the man in black shadowing the filming from across the street – I’m sure he’s not with the government. And never mind the fact that, as a state run system, the firefighters would have had to do and say anything the government told them to do or say else face the same type of consequences Reinaldo Arenas faced.
All of this evidence, *all* of it, means that Michael Moore had to have worked directly with Castro’s government to shoot the Cuban portion of Sicko. He worked side by side with the same man who destroyed the life of Reinaldo Arenas. He worked hand in hand with the same man who has destroyed the lives of the Cuban people for 45 years. And he did it all knowing he wasn’t showing the real truth, knowing all he was going to show the world was a piece of Castro-loving propaganda that turns its back on everything for which the Cuban people have fought.
Michael Moore is a Castro collaborator. He has actively and knowing collaborated with a sociopath, communist, mass-murdering dictator and he shows no remorse for it. Reinaldo Arenas had some choice words for men like Michael Moore who chose willingly to collaborate with Castro:
One day, eventually, the people will overthrow Castro, and the least they will do is bring to justice those who collaborated with the tyrant with impunity. The one who promote dialogue with Castro, well aware that Castro will never give up his power peacefully and that a truce and economic assistance are what he needs to strengthen his position, are as guilty as his own henchmen who torture and murder people. Those who are not living in Cuba are perhaps even more to blame, because inside Cuba you exist under absolute terror, but outside you can at least maintain a modicum of political integrity. All the pretentious people who dream of appearing on TV shaking Fidel Castro’s hand and of becoming politically relevant should have more realistic dreams: they should envision the rope from which they will swing in Havana’s Central Park, because the Cuban people, being generous, will hang them when their moment of truth comes. The only consolation for them will be to have avoided bloodshed.
Michael Moore is not an innocent party. He knew what he was showing the world was not the truth about Cuba and he did it anyway. He lied to the world and desecrated the memory of Reinaldo Arenas and all the brave men and women who have fought for the truth to come out about the real Cuba like Reinaldo Arenas. In his zeal to attack the United States government Michael Moore ignored the plight of the Cuban people and nullified their struggle for freedom. He twisted the truth to fit his agenda without any thought to those who might be hurt by this and ignored whatever facts didn’t fit with his agenda.
Michael Moore is a liar, a collaborator, and a maker of propaganda. He has shown no regard at all for the truly brave men like Reinaldo Arenas who spent their lives fighting for their art and their truth. It is Reinaldo Arenas we should respect and believe, not Michael Moore. It is Reinaldo Arenas we should honor for his fight for truth, not Michael More. And it is the work of Reinaldo Arenas that should live on in people’s minds and hearts, not the work of Michael Moore.
Shame on you, Michael Moore. Eternal shame on you for what you have done.
I rest my case.
* * * * * * * * * * *
A personal epilogue from the author to Reinaldo Arenas:
Look, Reinaldo, look! The moon is bright and full; she is back and smiling at you once again. Her light fills the breezeway and the shower of gold bush Adolfina planted there perfumes the air so sweetly. Celestino is calling you from the woods, Reinaldo. He is at it again, carving poems into the trunks of the almond trees and he wants you to help. Go to him, Reinaldo. Your work here is done. You have given me your gifts and your truths and I will hold these things dear to me for the rest of my life. Run to the woods and be free, Reinaldo. You have earned it. You are free.
Leaving Cuba
Michael C. Moynihan
August 14, 2007, 12:34pm
According the Melbourne Herald-Sun, Celia Guevara, Havana-based veterinarian and daughter of photogenic thug Che, was recently granted an Argentinian passport. Sources told the Buenos Aires daily Clarin that though Guevara “has no plans to leave Cuba,” she wants her sons to be able to travel freely, a privilege still reserved for the revolutionary elite. For most Cubans, taking a holiday in South Florida is, of course, rather more difficult, as evidenced by Yaditza Lopez’s recent efforts to go out on a date with her Internet boyfriend, Mr. Alex Menendez of Miami. The Miami Herald explains:
Menendez, who first saw Lopez’s photo on a website called Friends, started chatting with her online and sent her a photo of himself in May 2006. At the time, Lopez was attending a computer programming college in Havana.
As the couple kept communicating, Menendez told Lopez it would be nice if she came to Miami. When he got a call from her about 7 a.m. Friday, he was pleasantly shocked. ‘’I might marry her,’’ he said.
The 22-year-old Lopez had arrived before dawn as part of a contingent of 52 Cuban migrants, including men, women and several young children. They were wet and sunburned but happy to be in South Florida. They said they had been at sea for three days and came from all over the island.
Oddly, the 52 defectors traveling with Lopez eschewed free health care (that’s right, it’s free in Cuba!) and Fidel Castro’s 81st birthday party for an opulent cruise across the Florida Straits. Ungrateful, the lot of them.
Incidentally, Guevara, should she decide to leave her Cuba, would hardly be the first offspring of the revolution to do so. Fidel Castro’s sister Juanita lives in Miami, where, until last year, she operated the Mini-Price Pharmacy. After selling her business to CVS, the 74-year-old entrepreneur sold the vacant property for $2.2 million. Castro’s only daughter, Alina Fernandez, hosts an opposition radio show in Miami.
Astonishing, isn’t it, that any Cuban would want to give up their tropical worker’s paradise, where the healthcare is free and all medicine costs 5¢, to come to the evil kkkapitalist United States.
One of Cuba’s longest-serving political prisoners, Francisco Chaviano, was released Friday on ‘’conditional freedom’’ after serving 13 years in prison—and immediately blasted prison conditions on the island.
‘’I am back from hell,’’ Chaviano, 54, told El Nuevo Herald from his home in Jaimanitas, west of Havana. ``If Dante had known the Combinado del Este [prison], he would not have needed his imagination to write The Inferno. He simply would have told what he saw there.’’
‘’I spent five years stuck in a cell without seeing the sun, two years without receiving visitors and four years without conjugal visits,’’ he added. ``It was a cruel, merciless treatment that was also extended to my family, my wife and my children.’’
Chaviano, a mathematics professor at Havana’s Institute of Chemistry, was arrested on May 7, 1994, and sentenced by a military tribunal to 15 years in prison on charges that he ‘’disclosed secrets concerning the state security’’ and falsified documents.
He had been chairman of the Cuban Civil Rights Council, an organization that supported civil liberties and denounced the penetration of State Security agents into the dissident movement. His case had been brought to the attention of the human rights branches of the United Nations and Organization of American States.
Chaviano said prison life had seriously harmed his health, and that he now suffers from a rapidly growing tumor in one of his lungs and a serious heart condition. During the last two years, he was hospitalized several times with serious pulmonary and cardiac problems, he said.
‘’The damage in my lungs I owe to them [the government]. In Cuba, imprisonment kills,’’ Chaviano said.
But he added that he will not seek exile abroad and vowed to continue to actively oppose the government from inside the island.
‘’This country is a disaster,’’ he said. ``The economic pauperization is visible.’’
Chaviano was one of 73 Cubans regarded as prisoners of conscience by Amnesty International, and of about 200 listed by the illegal but tolerated Cuban Commission on Human Rights and National Reconciliation based in Havana.
‘’We consider his release to be good news, but we regret that—in his case, as in the cases of many other political prisoners—the government of Cuba continues to violate the terms of early release, as established by the current penal code,’’ said commission President Elizardo Sánchez.
Sánchez said that under the code, Chaviano should have been freed unconditionally on May 7.
However, Chaviano remained in prison an extra three months and his release was termed ``conditional.’’
This is for every Moore-on who thinks that things have changed at all in Cuba in the last 35 years or so. Also, how can this man be so ill? Cuba has the best care, and surely they treat citizens, even imprisoned ones, better than we treat enemy combatants at Gitmo, right?
What this boils down to is the fact that Castro’s regime won’t allow Sicko to rile up the Cuban people. Why would it rile them up, considering how much the film glorifies Cuban healthcare? Well, the answer to that is twofold.
First of all, it would be obvious to every Cuban in one instant that Michael Moore collaborated with Castro’s thugs in order to shoot the footage he shot and go the places he went. You simply can’t walk around Guantanamo or Havana with a film crew and a group of white tourists unless the government is involved. You don’t get to go to the fire station and have the ALL the firemen on parade unless they were ordered in advance to be there to greet you. And you don’t get to bring a film crew into the big shiny hospital either, which brings me to the second reason why the average Cuban would be angry watching Sicko:
They simply are not allowed that kind of care. It’s a lie.
We have shown you again and again what the average Cuban gets from the government, and it’s not Havana Hospital. Show the people a film that purports to the world that the common people, the ones without government connections or a foreign patron, the average Cuban, gets to go to the big shiny hospital? Never. Show a film that purports that one can walk into any corner pharmacy and get your prescription filled? Never. The pharmacies are empty. To show Sicko to the Cuban people puts the lie to the revolution. It proves Castro is a thieving dictator who forces his people to suffer so that a few may benefit. It shows socialism for the lie that it is. Banning the film keeps the average Cuban from seeing the lie, but Sicko spreads the lie around the world, painting Castro’s brutal regime in the light of grandfatherly caregiver.
I’ve just come across a simply stunning article which slices and dices Moore’s rosey depiction of Cuba to tiny pieces. This article is incredibly informative and shows you, step by step, how and why the figures and images that Moore paints of Cuban health care under Castro is not simply wrong… it’s downright shameful.
I strongly encourage you all to read the whole article, but here are some highlights for your perusal.
On the subject of Moore’s claim that Cubans live longer than Americans:
In “Sicko,” Moore parrots the Castroite claim that Cubans live longer than Americans. In fact the figures are practically identical, which actually casts Cuba’s vaunted health care in a negative light. In all nations with high emigration rates, longevity rates skew high. This occurs because the birth is recorded but the death gets recorded in the nation migrated to. So it seems like fewer people die. Naturally, the opposite effect appears in nations with a large influx of immigrants. The death is recorded but the birth was recorded in the nation immigrated from. So generally speaking, a nation with high longevity but known to hemorrhage its people has little to boast about with regard to longevity figures. All they’re proving is that theirs is a miserable place to live and from which massive numbers of people flee.
And few nations hemorrhage people like Cuba—almost 20% of its population since the glorious revolution. This 20% represents those who got out with the clothes on their back and against enormous odds.
This, of course, makes complete sense when you examine it. If a Cuban is born in Cuba but dies in the US, the death is never recorded in Cuba but rather in the US. This makes it seem as if fewer people are dying in Cuba, but all it really means is that massive numbers of people are fleeing the oppression of Castro’s regime. No matter how you look at it, this is a lose-lose situation for Moore - the facts are squarely against him.
On the quality and state of Cuban doctors:
A few years back Castro launched his “Doctor Diplomacy,” wherein he started sending Cuban “doctors” to heathen lands (though their spouses and children were held hostage in Cuba) to heal the sick and raise the dead. This was coupled with “free” treatment of poor foreigners from the Caribbean and Latin American nations in Cuban hospitals. The scheme has gotten no end of gushy reviews in the major media…
Brazil also got a birds-eye view of Cuba’s vaunted “Doctor Diplomacy.” The April 2005 story from Agence France-Presse titled “96 Cuban Doctors Expelled from Brazil” reported: “Federal Judge Marcelo Bernal ruled in favor of a demand by the Brazilian state of Tocantins’ Consejo Regional de Medicina (Regional Council on Medicine) that Cuban doctors be prohibited from practicing in their state.” Based on the results they’d achieved with Tocantins’ residents, the judge referred to the Cuban doctors as “Witch Doctors and Shamans. We cannot accept doctors who have not proven that they are doctors.”
According to a report by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, more than 75% of “doctors” with Cuban “medical degrees” flunk the exam given by the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates for licensing in the U.S. This exam is considered a cakewalk even by the graduates of Mexico’s Tec de Monterrey School of Medicine. Most Cuba-certified doctors even flunk the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates’ exam for certification as “physician assistants,” making them unfit even as nurses.
So much for those vaunted Cuban doctors we see in Sicko. These are people who do not have the knowledge or skill to pass the exam to become a nurse practitioner, let alone a doctor. Would you want to entrust your health with doctors with reputations such as these? I know the LAST thing I would think of doing is bringing 9/11 rescue workers to a country whose doctors who are routinely expelled from other countries as being too incompetent to practice medicine.
And, finally, on the Cuban infant mortality rate:
In April 2001, Dr. Juan Felipe GarcÃa, MD, of Jacksonville, Fla., interviewed several recent doctor defectors from Cuba. Based on what he heard he reported the following: “The official Cuban infant-mortality figure is a farce. Cuban pediatricians constantly falsify figures for the regime. If an infant dies during its first year, the doctors often report he was older. Otherwise, such lapses could cost him severe penalties and his job.”
Cuba’s infant mortality rate, though it plunged from 13th lowest in the world pre-Castro to 40th today—is also kept artificially low by an abortion rate of 0.71 abortion per live birth—the hemisphere’s highest by far, which “terminates” any pregnancy that even hints at trouble.
More interesting (and tragic) still, the maternal mortality rate in Cuba is almost four times that of the U.S. rate (33 versus 8.4 per 1,000). Peculiar how so many mothers die during childbirth in Cuba, but how many one- to four-year-olds perish, while from birth to one year old (the period during which they qualify in UN statistics as infants) they’re perfectly healthy.
This is just simply tragic now matter how you look at it. Forced abortions, high maternal death rates, artificially skewed infant mortality rates… this is simply an abhorrent system run by an abhorrent man, Fidel Castro. How Michael Moore could stomach praising this man and this regime after the crimes against humanity Castro continues to commit to this day astonishes me. All I can hope is that more people begin to call out and question Mr. Moore on his words and actions in regards to Cuba. In the face of facts such as these… how can Michael Moore support Cuba or Castro in any way???
PLEASE NOTE: This article is part one in a four part series about Cuba and the Cuban writer Reinaldo Arenas. You can find part one of this series here, part two here and part four here. If you have not read the previous parts of this series, please do so before reading this. The entire series is collected in one post here. Unless otherwise noted, all quotes contained within this series are taken from Reinaldo Arenas’ autobiography “Before Night Falls” translated by Dolores M. Koch.
The sun was hot and the water was warm in the summer of 1973. Reinaldo Arenas and his friend Pepe Malas were enjoying a swim at Guanabo Beach when they discovered that they had been robbed off all their belongings, including their clothes and bags. Against Reinaldo’s protestations, Malas called over a nearby police officer and reported the theft. The young thieves were quickly apprehended by the police and both Arenas and Malas were requested to appear at the Havana police department the following day.
Reinaldo Arenas was filled with apprehension; he feared a police trap. Unfortunately for him, his premonition was correct. The young thieves accused Arenas and Malas of being homosexuals who had tried to fondle their genitals. Because under Castro’s law “in the case of a homosexual committing a sexual crime, anyone’s accusation was enough to prosecute”, both Reinaldo Arenas and Pepe Malas were immediately arresting for the corruption of minors and brought to the Guanabo jail.
After Reinaldo Arenas was released on bail he met with his appointed lawyer… and realized the situation was far more dire than he could have ever guessed. His terrified attorney showed him an overflowing file filled with information about Arenas’ illegal overseas publications and statements against him from some of his closest friends. Because Arenas had published overseas without Castro’s permission he was seen as a counter-revolutionary and a threat to Castro’s regime. Between these publications and the sworn statements by his friends against him, Reinaldo Arenas was now facing charges for political crimes and was looking at eight years or more in jail.
Arenas was arrested again the next day and was taken to the Patu Miramar police jail. Shortly after his arrival at the jail, there was a brief commotion and his cell door was left unlocked. In an incredibly daring move, Reinaldo slipped the lock off the door, quietly left the station and dove into the water nearby. It was an amazing escape, and Arenas was able to swim to a distant beach where he wouldn’t be quickly apprehended.
His situation now turning more desperate by the minute, Reinaldo Arenas decided to risk an escape to Guantanamo Bay in the hopes he could reach US soil. He shaved off his long hair, donned a set of threadbare clothes and took a three day long train ride to Guantanamo. Under the cover of night, Reinaldo Arenas set out for the first river crossing that would take him to safety. However, when he reached the river he heard strange crackling noises in the water. Suddenly, bright green lights appeared around him and machine gun fire rang out in the night. The lights were infrared sensors – the Cuban border patrol had sensed an intruder and began hunting him. Terrified, Reinaldo scaled a tall tree and hid there for two days and nights until the search was over.
When Arenas finally descended from his hiding place in the tree he tried again to cross the river. It was only after he began his swim across the dark river that he discovered the source of those odd crackling sounds. The river was filled with alligators – the cracking sound was the gnashing of their teeth. With so many predators in the water there was simply no way to cross. Defeated, Reinaldo Arenas was forced