2 of 2
2
Flint turns on Moore even more…
Posted: 03 March 2006 10:57 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 16 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  208
Joined  2006-03-02
Xetrov - 02 March 2006 02:05 PM

If you want to see Moore’s own signed Schedule D declaring his capital gains and losses where his stock ownership is listed, it’s emblazoned on the cover of Peter Schweizer’s book, “Do As I Say (Not As I Do): Profiles in Liberal Hypocrisy.” On it, you will find that Moore owns plenty of stock despite saying he doesn’t own any stock at all, including 2000 shares of Halliburton.

From the article you provided:

“But Moore’s loophole may be that the stock is actually owned by his non-profit foundation – not him personally. However, Moore signed the return personally and controls the activity of the corporation.”

Non-profit organisation.  Non-profit organisation.  Non-profit organisation.

I was right!  IF this is all true, and as I said before if Moore has done something wrong, let’s bring him to court, but if this article is true (and I’ll give it the benefit of the doubt too), then what is the problem?  I think it’s a great thing.

Moore’s NON-PROFIT ORGANISATION gets shares from Halliburton.  “They will sell you the rope to hang themselves with.” Moore is a genius.

Moore said “I don’t own Halliburton stock.”

Show me a piece of evidence that shows clearly and without any doubt that Moore personally owns and benefits from Halliburton stock. You can’t.  End of story.

 Signature 

I’m a fucking liar who pretended to be American because I thought you would accept my trolling bullshit.  Also, you’ll note in this thread (where I try to get other trolls to join me) that my friends and I are anti-semitic Holocaust deniers.  Aren’t we fun?  Lying and hating Jews is fun!

Profile
 
 
Posted: 06 March 2006 10:25 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 17 ]
Lives here
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2664
Joined  2005-07-11

How stupid are you?

Michael Douglas - 03 March 2006 10:57 PM

From the article you provided:

“But Moore’s loophole may be that the stock is actually owned by his non-profit foundation – not him personally. However, Moore signed the return personally and controls the activity of the corporation.

Non-profit organisation.  Non-profit organisation.  Non-profit organisation.

And?  Non-profit organizations (Yet another word you curiously spell non-Americanized) are simply used by people for tax loopholes.  Yet more evidence Moore plays the system all the while telling other people he’s ‘just like them’.  You’re a joke.

 Signature 

When the going get tough, Fred Thompson knocks the going down and makes it his bitch.

090308.jpg

Profile
 
 
Posted: 06 March 2006 10:27 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 18 ]
Jr. Member
Avatar
RankRank
Total Posts:  95
Joined  2004-10-06

Its sad when people are willing to go off cliffs for that guy and wouldn’t believe any evedence about him if he told it to them himself.

 Signature 

I kick Ass.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 06 March 2006 03:04 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 19 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  488
Joined  2003-09-03
Xetrov - 06 March 2006 10:25 AM

How stupid are you?

Michael Douglas - 03 March 2006 10:57 PM
From the article you provided:

“But Moore’s loophole may be that the stock is actually owned by his non-profit foundation – not him personally. However, Moore signed the return personally and controls the activity of the corporation.

Non-profit organisation.  Non-profit organisation.  Non-profit organisation.

And?  Non-profit organizations (Yet another word you curiously spell non-Americanized) are simply used by people for tax loopholes.  Yet more evidence Moore plays the system all the while telling other people he’s ‘just like them’.  You’re a joke.

You know… that’s how they spell it in Ireland…

 Signature 

Aim for where the horizon and blue skies meet

Profile
 
 
   
2 of 2
2