Lusepher - 14 June 2007 08:32 PM
Considering I don’t genrally sift through the front page, how about reposting your response here, w0rf.
Happy to oblige. Forgive any crude editing:
I find it quite disturbing someone would make a website just to tell the world how evil a person is.
You’re right. It’s much better when you make a website AND a series of… “documentaries” AND a series of books AND a TV show to decry the “evil” people that have “hijacked” your country.
The owner of the website should have realised this when he realised he didn’t have any money to help his seriously ill wife (that’s how I understood it?) that such a hateful and non-productive site consumes so much time and energy and money.
Try to keep up, please. He HAD the money to help his wife. He HAD the money to keep the site up. Moore cut a check TWO YEARS after his request for help went out, and it was because his ISP host was SCAMMING HIM. So the way you understood it is dead-ass wrong, and you need to sit your source down and have a talk with that person about getting stuff right for a change.
I’m pretty sure Micheal Moore gives us all a lot of debate. Debate is good.
Debate is good. Manufacturing support for your position is not.
Seriously, I don’t know why people keep coming back to this. So here I go: Socialized health care is bad, because in England it causes the death of 500,000 people every single year. EVERY YEAR.
Now I don’t want to hear word one about how I just made that number up. The point is, socialized health care is bad, and since I’m obviously right about that, inventing stuff about England that has no basis in fact DOES NOT MATTER. You should all get on your knees and thank me for giving you all a lot of debate. After all, that is the Holy Grail of Examining Social Issues.
To claim Moore is a bad person and full of shit is just stupid.
To claim Moore is a bad person is stupid. To claim Moore is full of shit is an observation as basic as saying the sun rose this morning.
In his movie the only thing he’s trying to show to people of every part of American society is that in other 1st world countries every single person, no matter what kind of income they have, receive a basic medical care.
In AMERICA, every single person, no matter what kind of income they have, receives basic medical care. Moore IS NOT ARGUING FOR BASIC MEDICAL CARE. He is championing a system of UNIVERSAL, SINGLE-PAYER health care. That means the government collects ALL health care fees and pays ALL health care bills. That is NOT “basic medical care”. That is EVERY form of care. Words like “universal” and “all” are all-inclusive and carry no reservations.
Would you call Great Britain, France, Germany, Denmark, Holland and other such countries socialist or communist? Well, come to think of it, Great Britain and France for example are being run by socialist parties.
Why do you ask a rhetorical question, and then answer it “yes”? I guess that makes you “very, very short-sighted”, per your own description.
Why do you think America is on the bottom of the list of countries with best medical care??
Depending on who’s doing your survey, the US is somewhere in the 20’s on life expectancy, in the high 30’s on overall health system performance, and in the low 70’s on “level of health”, whatever that means. Now granted, there’s very little reason we should not be #1 in all of those, given the money we spend, but the last time I looked, there were something like 230 legally recognized countries in the world. I don’t see any two-hundred-anything in those numbers. So your argument about us being at the bottom of the list is ludicrous.
Moore only gives American insight in the fact that people WILL NEVER be turned down for medical attention based on INCOME.
In AMERICA, people are not turned down based on income. They simply have to go to the ER for emergencies, or a free clinic for less-pressing issues. I think what you mean is that in England, they turn people away because they are smokers rather than poor.
In that respect he’s right, European countries (among others) are far more humane then America.
Londoner has told us that Europeans never look at things in terms of being “better” or “worse” so I think you two need to get in touch and get your stories straightened out.
Back to the point that I lived in England. Not all is good with the NHS. Not all is all rosey coloured with the healthcare system in Holland and Im pretty damn sure it isnt either in France.
Well, I guess what you guys need is some fat guy in a ball cap to treat your health care systems with sarcasm and derision, in order to “bring you debate” so you can “fix” your “broken” and “barbaric” systems. Those are the only two choices that are on the table, after all, either “utopian” or “barbaric”, cause if the system isn’t “utopian” then Moore is obviously right and we’re all just a bunch of angry bitter jerks. /sarcasm