If a country isnt contributing to the benefit of the globe, it’s just a worthless leecher, and should be dealt with.
Once again, a telling display of bigotry, racism and ignorance.
A leech is a parasitical organism. It needs a host. Other “societies” are the parasites and your “society” is the host, right. Because it’s your “societies” world and resouces they are draining, right? Unless of course by benefit of the “globe” you meant planet and that would put you on ecological grounds. Of course, that would put youe “society” in a bad way too.
Now did you read that link? How do you match up? Are you a contributor or a leech? If it is the latter, please check out the nearest high bridge in your local area and deal with yourself. For the benefit of the globe. Thank you.
Mikey, yes I did. And looking at your link, it appears most are contributing to the success of America, not Iran, which only shows Iran is a waste of space, like Syria and Saudi Arabia.
Am I a contributor? Country-wise, yes. I’m an American, and the contributions of America to the rest of the world are unmatchable in today’s society, however do you mean as a person? Yes. I’m getting a higher education, so I can contribute to American society, and the globe.
So back to nuking Iran, Syria, and SA, I’m still for it. I’ll even kick it up a notch. If I could, I’d nuke the entire fucking middle east with the exception of Israel. How do you like that?
Mikey, yes I did. And looking at your link, it appears most are contributing to the success of America,
There’s gratitude for ya!;-P
I’m an American, and the contributions of America to the rest of the world are unmatchable in today’s society,
Why is it that many who hate to be blamed for their country’s misedeeds, are very quick to take credit for another countryman’s acievements?
however do you mean as a person? Yes. I’m getting a higher education, so I can contribute to American society, and the globe
.
Yes, well getting an education is certainly a step in the right direction.;-)
So back to nuking Iran, Syria, and SA, I’m still for it. I’ll even kick it up a notch. If I could, I’d nuke the entire fucking middle east with the exception of Israel. How do you like that?
Mikey, yes I did. And looking at your link, it appears most are contributing to the success of America, not Iran, which only shows Iran is a waste of space, like Syria and Saudi Arabia.
Am I a contributor? Country-wise, yes. I’m an American, and the contributions of America to the rest of the world are unmatchable in today’s society, however do you mean as a person? Yes. I’m getting a higher education, so I can contribute to American society, and the globe.
So back to nuking Iran, Syria, and SA, I’m still for it. I’ll even kick it up a notch. If I could, I’d nuke the entire fucking middle east with the exception of Israel. How do you like that?
If a country isnt contributing to the benefit of the globe, it’s just a worthless leecher, and should be dealt with.
so your logic is that if someone doesnt pull their weight then they have to go, so logicly what happens to the disabled, retarded and elderly in soultopia? while were on the subject what happens to those with no money or the weka in general
what happens if some time in the futre america doesnt “pull it’s weight”?
Tehran defiant as UN’s nuclear body reluctantly issues statement
Ian Traynor in Vienna
Friday August 12, 2005
The Guardian
The main European powers last night pressured the UN nuclear authority into ordering Iran to freeze its nuclear activities as Tehran appeared to be winning a high-stakes diplomatic battle in the long-running dispute.
sock!
no military intervention necessary, just a steely gaze and strak dialogue. krillo!
So the nuclear moralists in Washington have no problem with Israeli, Pakistani and Indian nuclear weapons, developed and stockpiled with contemptous disregard for the Non-Proliferation Treaty, but the White House and talking heads of US television are insisting that Iran has no right to do what the treaty allows it and other signers to do - develop nuclear power.
If a country isnt contributing to the benefit of the globe, it’s just a worthless leecher, and should be dealt with.
So back to nuking Iran, Syria, and SA, I’m still for it. I’ll even kick it up a notch. If I could, I’d nuke the entire fucking middle east with the exception of Israel. How do you like that?
I don’t see much use for the continents of South America and Africa either.
Wow Soul, just wow...........
Do you think we should “deal” with South America and Africa like you think we should “deal” with most of the Middle East? I bet the people there would most definately love that.
Answer my question that I asked earlier please. Should we “deal” with South America and Africa in the same way that you, SoulEata, would “deal” with most of the Middle East?
US President George Bush today warned that “all options are on the table” if Iran refuses to comply with international demands to halt its nuclear programme.
Noting that he has already used force to secure the United States, he said in an interview with Israel TV that the US and Israel “are united in our objective to make sure that Iran does not have a weapon”.
If diplomacy fails, President Bush said “all options are on the table. The use of force is the last option for any president.”
He added: “You know, we’ve used force in the recent past to secure our country.”
WASHINGTON, July 4 - The Pentagon’s most senior planners are challenging the longstanding strategy that requires the armed forces to be prepared to fight two major wars at a time. Instead, they are weighing whether to shape the military to mount one conventional campaign while devoting more resources to defending American territory and antiterrorism efforts.
