Cocksucking Moron
There’s nothing I find more entertaining than people who write me hate mail telling me how stupid I am, and do so in an email filled with spelling errors. Note “your” and “fowl” and the use of “U” in this email from .
I’m gonna make this short and quick so that I dont waste too much of my time
YOUR A MORON
Yes yes I hate moore too his movies are one sided and point out benefits but no problems. A horrible debater and anyone who argues with him is in for a treat
HOWEVER, you and your friend run the biggest anti moore site, but your just as bad as moore, if not worse. U never combat moore fans with real facts, instead telling them they are stupid and mindless (or cocksuckers) and then bask in curse words and fowl langeuge as you point out they are a moore fan, hence they are stupid
My friend I’ve done this arguement with a moore fan many a time but I gotta say man, your as bad, and by doing that, your making us all look bad
cocksucking moron…
I’d be willing to bet my next paycheck that our good friend Jordan is indeed a Michael Moore fan, but that’s not really the point. Jordan has obviously never read the site before. For the past—what, five years now?—Jim and I and the other contributors have posted VOLUMES of data and arguments against Moore’s claims. My guess is he saw the movie, went to the site, and read the first two or three posts, which lately have been dealing both with the copious amounts of email that Jim and I have been receiving from Moore fans and the general level of illiteracy and ignorance that they display. Note that in this post I specifically detailed and responded to some of the intelligent email critiques that we have received. And we’ve done this numerous times over the years. Good letters making good points are responded to politely with logical refutations. Hate mail is posted to be ridiculed and laughed at.
So, to Jordan and anyone else who may read this, do yourself a favor and spend more than five minutes skimming the top two posts. The entire point of this site was to act as a single-source repository of sorts for people wishing to make factual refutations to Moore’s claims. Jim and I joke that we’re the most uncredited media source in the world, for we have no doubt that members of the press doing Moore research monitor this site. Jim and I have both done media interviews. I was interviewed by a reporter for the Times of London once for over an hour, and while I wasn’t directly quoted for the piece, many of the points and issues I raised did indeed make it in.
On the right hand side of the front page are the categories for each post. If you want to view posts relating to Sicko or F9/11, for example, you can do so. If you want horror stories of people having to pull out their own teeth with pliers because they couldn’t get an NHS dentist, or a woman who had to make a mixture of fake blood and pretend she was vomiting it up in order to get admitted to hospital, you can find them there. (Both these stories came from the UK, one of Moore’s socialist healthcare utopias.) If you want to see arguments eviscerating the idea of gun control there are hundreds of them, studies and scholarly articles and the like. If you saw Sicko and wonder why the US can’t have a wonderful tropical healthcare wonderland like the tiny communist island, you can find photos of Cuban patients sitting in pools of their own excrement, or Donna’s excellent series of articles on Reinaldo Arenas. The data are all there, but you have to spend more than two seconds on the site looking for them.
Basically most people expect this site to be like some kind of magic encyclopedia, where they can close their eyes, grab a volume off the shelf, open to any random page, and presto! find the information they’re looking for. It doesn’t work that way. Information here is presented in a linear fashion, from most recent posts to the oldest, so if the issue you are looking for isn’t recent then you might have to dig a little. You can search the site using both Google and the software’s built in search capabilities.
It’s not difficult. It’s all there. But “your” going to have to be more than a “cocksucking moron” to find it.
Comments
(Pssst. Lee posted this. It was Donna, Jim’s wife, that Moore tried to use. Just to let ya know, man.)
Thanks Rann, I forgot to clarify that part. I didn’t intend to post when I first came, but after looking through the posts over the last week, I couldn’t hold back. I admit that I disliked Moore’s work before, but held him in respect. Now, that respect is gone. How low can one man go?
"fowl langeuge” (sic.) Of course, it is the only way to talk to chickens.
You’d think a guy would be more careful when his reputation as a sentient being was at stake.
It only takes a minute to reread your post, and with the preview feature, you can’t escape it. The mistakes must have been intentional, for some cryptic reason that we’ll never understand.
Cocksucker - someone who sucks a male chicken? This chap has a hen-fetish.
Liberals using the term is kinda odd as all gay men engaging in any sort of sexual pratice are as 100% human as the next hetero (even if they’re “morons”, i.e. “mentally handicapped"), and women who offer and indulge in it freely are the best kind, its said, so how, exactly, is “cocksucker” a degoratory term?
What exactly does this e-mail have to do with Michael Moore? Did he write it? Does this person work for him?
yngcelt, are you aware of how butthurt you’re coming off as?
"butthurt”? I’m afraid I’m not familiar with this expression.
Liberals using the term is kinda odd as all gay men engaging in any sort of sexual pratice are as 100% human as the next hetero (even if they’re “morons”, i.e. “mentally handicapped"), and women who offer and indulge in it freely are the best kind, its said, so how, exactly, is “cocksucker” a degoratory term?
And following that logic, wouldn’t that make the person who wrote this nasty e-mail a bigot and possibly a homophobe?
(No, no gross pictures or anything.)
wow! There is a site with made up words?! Well, I can see where your line of “logic” comes from now Rann. Hey! Here’s a new word for you:
Rannting:
verb
1. When one rambles on with useless, meaningless rants that personally attack others or judges them based on the individual’s own undeserved sense of self-importance;
2. What the blogger identified as “Rann Aridorn” frequently does on websites such as Moorewatch.com.
Example:
“I couldn’t actually come up with a snappy comeback and since I had no clue what anyone was talking about, I started rannting on the blog.”
Wow. Just… wow, man.
Thank you for another example of a “rannting”!
Say, this is fun!
Please stop trying to drag the argument from the “Those Tolerant Muslims” post into this one - or any other thread. Please read my update to the “Those Tolerant Muslims” post.
Thanks,
The management. :)
Sorry, I had already posted that before you posted your update.
So was this person signing their e-mail with the moniker “cock sucking moron”?
Seems like a strange name to give yourself!
RSS (Subscribe)
Chances are, I wouldn’t have come here if it hadn’t been for Micheal Moore’s Sicko. This is my first post, and I’ll probably post more in the future. Thank you Lee and Jim for the opportunity.
I had a feeling that a lot of hate mail would come after Moore created this nicely packaged “documentary” that every Moore-on who watched it could become an instant professional on the subject of American health care.
Not all of us are so well duped.
The attempt by Moore to use your wife was outrageous and had he tried to use my own wife to further his own ends while disguising it as anonymous… hello idiots, it’s not anonymous when it’s in the movie… I’d be on the phone to every news and radio station challenging Moore to face me one-on-one.
Which brings me to yet another speculation. If Moore will use someone’s wife he never even met… how many of these Moore-ons and hate letters are Moore himself? Anonymously, of course! He can’t deny that he knows the website and hasn’t been to it.
Maybe the Moore-ons can find a way to the Moore fan sites, but Moore didn’t put one in the movie, it may be against the rules to think outside of Moore’s set ideals.
Free thinking is a precious thing. Don’t follow the crowd, think for yourself.