Manufacturing Dissent - Uncovering Michael Moore


Michael Hearts Cindy - The Musical

Posted by JimK on 03/07/06 at 01:39 PM

Nice.

Casey, I love the way she says “bullshit!” (says “bullshit!")
and that the evil Jooz did it (the Jooz did it)
Did your mom get back from her Crawford trip? (Crawford trip)
Is she there, or is she still giving Dubya some lip? (Dubya some lip)

You’ll have to head to The Jawa Report for more.

Now late the hate-filled comments pour in!

Posted on 03/07/2006 at 01:39 PM • PermalinkE-mail this to a friendDiscuss in the forums

Manufacturing Dissent - Uncovering Michael Moore

Comments


Posted by yngcelt  on  03/07/2006  at  05:25 PM (Link to this comment | )

OMG
I was laughing so hard when I read that.  That is fucking classic.  Please, someone with some video software and musical ability make a music video of this!
I would love to see the guys over at jibjab do something like this.

Posted by Alderon  on  03/07/2006  at  05:35 PM (Link to this comment | )

Sorry if this doesnt exactly deal with the exact topic of the thread, but did anyone else see that this ignoramus got herself arrested again.  i really dont know of anyone that seems to like to be handcuffed so much outside of an S and M joint!!

Posted by Alderon  on  03/07/2006  at  05:39 PM (Link to this comment | )

also, for those who havent read it, theres even a story on msnbc about it (believe it or not) heres the link…

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/11706772/

however i must warn you, cindy’s sexy little body does show off a bit in the picutre for the story.  i’d recomend being 18!!

Posted by yngcelt  on  03/07/2006  at  06:47 PM (Link to this comment | )

Ahem, let me just...erp...uh, just say...urp...Oh damn!
BLEEEEECHHHH!!!!
Oh man, there goes lunch.  Why oh why did they have to show her nasty, pasty white muffin top like that?
I also noticed how she was obviously making no effort to comply with police when the officer was trying to get her up off the ground.  Obviously, she’s trying to crawl and milk more time for the cameras.
I am happy, however, that someone in the media is finally reporting that this broad is just one media stunt after another and has no truly sincere plan to actually discuss anything with anybody.
I also noticed that Michael Stipe will be doing some concert with Cindy in NY on the 3rd anniversary of the Iraq invasion.
Michael Stipe, Mikey Mikey Mikey!  You have millions of dollars and yet you still feel the need to look like a middle-aged homeless male prostitute.  Come to think of it, you and Cindy make a great pair.  The rock n roll male prostitute and the attention-seeking media whore!

Posted by genFX  on  03/07/2006  at  08:26 PM (Link to this comment | )

Cindy Shehan is a MILF.

Mother I’d Like to Frag.

It is morons like her that drive me towards the right (despite the various personal ethics issues they have).  The Onion’s article lampooning the Democrats was perfect, not that it relates to Sheehan but rather why I disdain the leftists in this country right now.

Posted by Swissboy  on  03/07/2006  at  08:33 PM (Link to this comment | )

I use to like this women, her whole “lone mother against the evil republicans who killed her son” aura realy tingled my emotional fiber. But I got to admit she’s realy hurting the anti-war movment now, she’s just embarassing.

To herself, her son and the left as a whole (but we got bigger problems when it comes to embarassment).

That’s the boomerang coming back at us, the media has shown her rise, they’ll show her fall.

Posted by Rann Aridorn  on  03/08/2006  at  01:02 AM (Link to this comment | )

To herself, her son and the left as a whole (but we got bigger problems when it comes to embarassment).

Primarily in that it’s made up of people like you.
Physician, heal thyself.

Posted by McCloud  on  03/08/2006  at  02:51 AM (Link to this comment | )

Coretta Scott King knew how to express dissension without acting like Abby Hoffman in drag.

From Wikipedia:

“In 1962, she served as a Women’s Strike for Peace delegate to the 17-nation Disarmament Conference in Geneva, Switzerland. In addition, she preceded her husband by two years in opposing the Vietnam War, addressing a 1965 anti-war rally at Madison Square Garden in New York City, while also serving as a liaison to international peace and justice organizations...During the 1980s, King reaffirmed her long-standing opposition to apartheid, participating in a series of sit-in protests in Washington, D.C. that prompted nationwide demonstrations against South African racial policies.”

So how is that different from what Cindy’s doing?

Cookie at The Cookshack - Gab & Grub asks the musical question, “Bad girl...Bad girl...Whatcha gonna do when the war is through?

When is the war through? Last time I checked, it was supposed to be over in a few months. Then 3 years ago, it was “mission accomplished”. So what gives?

Posted by DrEngine  on  03/08/2006  at  02:56 AM (Link to this comment | )

The war is over.  If you want it to be.--John Lennon

Posted by wolfschant  on  03/08/2006  at  04:03 AM (Link to this comment | )

And as for you JimK
Seirously you are madly obsessed with Sheehan.  Either change the name to Sheehanwatch or post something else.  But oh yeah there is nothing the fuck else to talk about

In a big way, Cindy Sheehan is Michael Moore. She is one of his main activities at the moment. So reporting on her is totally fine by me. It’s become more obvious than ever that she is a puppet of Moore and other extreme left wing antagonists.

His website is constantly updated with her writings. Check them out. In fact, Cindy is the most interesting thing Moore has going at the moment, as he works on his film. Until better news comes up, Cindy is reportworthy on this website - no matter how tedious and predictable she has become. She is still Moore related.

I’m enoying watching her fall. Yet, I feel sorry for her, kinda. I think she’s been tricked into thinking that she is some brilliant spokesperson, some demi-mesiah come to right the wrongs. I think she thinks that she’s special (while completely forgeting that Casey existed in the process). She’s not just been used, shes been programmed into a little robot by her supposed supporters, and she’s being used up to the point of having to try harder for media coverage. The sad part of it is, there is no going back for her. Even if she wanted to she couldn’t stop this emminent train wreck. Yeah, she’s a fool to say what she says, and do what she does, and for letting these people use her this way - but the people using her this way just disgust the hell out of me.

The only way for her to fix her life up now is to commit media seppuku. Just admit she was wrong, say she respects her sons decisions and Bush and give a final interview and just get back to her life. And sadly, that won’t happen.

Posted by Rumble  on  03/08/2006  at  08:23 AM (Link to this comment | )

And as for you JimK
Seirously you are madly obsessed with Sheehan.  Either change the name to Sheehanwatch or post something else. But oh yeah there is nothing the fuck else to talk about (rolls eyes)

Ya know, I just like the way some people try to run this site.

Posted by tboy  on  03/08/2006  at  09:49 AM (Link to this comment | )

And as for you JimK
Seirously you are madly obsessed with Sheehan.  Either change the name to Sheehanwatch or post something else.  But oh yeah there is nothing the fuck else to talk about (rolls eyes)

If you don’t like it, then don’t post here.

When is the war through? Last time I checked, it was supposed to be over in a few months. Then 3 years ago, it was “mission accomplished”. So what gives?

Bullshit lie. Can you pull anymore shit out of your ass?

Cindy Shehan is a MILF.

Mother I’d Like to Frag.

Nice one genFX. :)

Posted by Filthy Jack  on  03/08/2006  at  11:41 AM (Link to this comment | )

I love it when libs use Wikipedia *chuckle* as a source.

Posted by Swissboy  on  03/08/2006  at  12:40 PM (Link to this comment | )

Oh Swissboy what planet are you living on?  Of course I’m sure you don’t believe the people who actually shoot at our troops are responsible for killing the Troops.  But I’m sure you like Sheehan refer to them as freedom fighters.

I hate wars not warriors, I call these guys filthy terrorists (or islamic fundamentalists in public) and I never implied that bush or his administration killed her son, I just have enough sensitivity (and it doesn’t take that much realy) to understand that when a mother loses her child she needs someone to blame, people cope with the pain the way they can…

Posted by iggy21  on  03/08/2006  at  12:43 PM (Link to this comment | )

from the MSN article

Richard Grenell, the spokesman for the U.S. Mission, said in response to Sheehan’s arrest: “We invited her in to discuss her concerns with a U.S. Mission employee. She chose not to come in but to lay down in front of the building and block the entrance. It was clearly designed to be a media stunt, not aimed at rational discussion,” Grenell said.

Posted by Swissboy  on  03/08/2006  at  12:47 PM (Link to this comment | )

Primarily in that it’s made up of people like you.
Physician, heal thyself.

Oh thanks Rann, very touching.

Of course you got some embarassment issues on the right as well…

like the vice president shooting is friend in the head or the president threatning to attack america…

yeah, lets not talk about that.

Posted by MostlyRepubMan  on  03/08/2006  at  01:23 PM (Link to this comment | )

Fairplay, you said “And as for you JimK
Seirously you are madly obsessed with Sheehan.  Either change the name to Sheehanwatch or post something else.  But oh yeah there is nothing the fuck else to talk about (rolls eyes)”
Like was stated by Tboy, if you don’t like posting here, go someplace else. Yes, you are entitled to your opinion, but send Jim and e-mail with it...don’t clog our forums with your whining. Also, this site is called “Moorewatch”, which means we follow Moore and his antics. Mikey has been using Ms. Sheahan on her site, so that makes her fairgame on this site. As long as she is going to continue protesting the post-war efforts of our country and all the other nations involved, we are going to continue to monitor her behavior. She brings this on herself...we don’t force her to say and do the stupid things she does.

McLoud, you said “When is the war through? Last time I checked, it was supposed to be over in a few months. Then 3 years ago, it was “mission accomplished”. So what gives?”

The mission “is accomplished”, dumbass! The War IS over, jackass! Our mission was to oust a dictator who had 10 years to comply with UN sanctions and spend two months hiding the WMDs our spied saw him hiding before he allowing UN inspectors into his country. Our troops are dealing with the aftermaths of war, that is why they are still there, finishing the job.
Dr. Engine - See above comments.
I normally refrain from name calling, but I have actually let Mickey follower/Leftist push me to where I have lost my patience. Now that that is off of my chest, I can continue living my modest American life, given to me by the men and women who have sacrificed so much so people like me can continue to enjoy the freedoms our forefathers worked hard to develop.

Posted by yngcelt  on  03/08/2006  at  01:37 PM (Link to this comment | )

Oh yeah if you don’t agree with the moderator your opinion isn’t welcome here.  Yeah that’s a very open minded philosophy there Tboy.  That T must stand for Tolarance eh?  I guess your not a big fan of debate.  Seriously that kind of mindset is something you see on far left kook boards I wasn’t expecting to find it here.

Actually our site here is VERY different.  For example, your posts as pointless as they are remain here where they can be read.  If you were to post challenging or unpopular opinions on say, alternet or democratic underground, they would be yanked automatically and you would be banned from the site.  I know because it has happened to me numerous times.
And Tboy’s point was not that you have to agree with the moderator.  Just have an actual point or on topic statement.  If you don’t like the topic or don’t feel it is worth your time, then don’t post.  There have been several topics discussed here that I haven’t posted on because I didnt think they were worth my time.  And I have been a loyal fan of this site and even been given the opportunity to post my own topics a couple of times.
Freedom of speech is a funny thing.  You have the freedom to say what you want, but you also have the responsibility of your statements as well.  Lefties tend to forget that part.  You also have the right to not speak up if you don’t want to.
Maybe you should exercise the latter!

Posted by JimK  on  03/08/2006  at  02:19 PM (Link to this comment | )

Fairplay, are you aware that different people post here, and that my name is not paratrooper?  Or are you just a stupid trolling asshole who thinks everyone has to have the exact same ideas about everything?

This isn’t your site, so piss the fuck off.  If you don’t like it here, LEAVE. No one is forcing you to read this site, you can stop any time you want.  You don’t get to dictate what I post about and then cry foul when someone calls you on your bullshit.

Posted by tboy  on  03/08/2006  at  02:52 PM (Link to this comment | )

Oh yeah if you don’t agree with the moderator your opinion isn’t welcome here.  Yeah that’s a very open minded philosophy there Tboy.  That T must stand for Tolarance eh?  I guess your not a big fan of debate.  Seriously that kind of mindset is something you see on far left kook boards I wasn’t expecting to find it here.

Wait...you are bitching about what Jim is posting and I state “if you don’t like it then don’t post”, that meant people’s opinions aren’t welcome here??? Nice spin Fairplay. Try again.

So tell me how you making those comments is showing us your great debating skills? Sorry I just didn’t see it, maybe I missed it.

I usually don’t post to much, because I enjoy reading the site. You can say what you want about me, I don’t really care. But if you are gonna TRY and insult me, try to make it a little more valid.

Sorry for OT Jim, but Fairchild needed to be set straight on a few of his “debating” skills.

Posted by tboy  on  03/08/2006  at  02:53 PM (Link to this comment | )

Thanks guys I got interupted and forgot to hit submit.

Posted by Vermin  on  03/08/2006  at  03:10 PM (Link to this comment | )

Fairplay-

If JimK wants to write about Sheehan he can.  If he wants to post an article about how big Hillary’s ass is getting he can.  If you don’t want to read it, you don’t have to.  If you feel the need to repeatedly voice the same objection to what he is posting you can, but don’t pretend that the people on this board, some of whom are interested in discussing what she-nanigans is up to, are some how trying to censor you by disagreeing with you or criticizing your opinion.  A debate would consist of you taking a position--Sheehan is not a publicity whore, for example, and then defending it.  Repeatedly objecting to the topic of discussion is not debate.  If what is posted by the moderators of this site is of that much concern to you, start your own blog, “moorewatchwatch” or “Jimkwatch” maybe, and whine to your hearts content about what is posted here.

Posted by Rann Aridorn  on  03/08/2006  at  03:12 PM (Link to this comment | )

I would like to thank Swissboy for so thoroughly making my point about him.

Posted by Vermin  on  03/08/2006  at  04:59 PM (Link to this comment | )

Alright Vermin perhaps you would like to post the comment I made about this site trying to censor me.

With pleasure:

Oh yeah if you don’t agree with the moderator your opinion isn’t welcome here.

And ok your interested in her shanangans Vermin?  My question to you is why?

That’s a fair question.  The simple answer is because she is taking a steaming shit on the graves of Marines--and all service members--who have died in Iraq and whom I love like brothers.  Oh yeah, she’s freaking irritating and ugly too.

My questions to you are: Why do you care what I am interested in discussing, and why do you feel the need to constantly let the readership of Moorewatch know that you don’t approve of what we choose to discuss?

Posted by wolfschant  on  03/08/2006  at  05:00 PM (Link to this comment | )

Fairplay -

Just shut the fuck up. You more you ramble, the worse you make it for yourself. Cindy is directly Moore related. You’ve blatantly ignored that she has a running letter campaign going on his site only. You ignore that she is a big part of what he is doing right now. Why? So you can try to make a moot point about how this website is run?

You’re petty.

Posted by JimK  on  03/08/2006  at  05:01 PM (Link to this comment | )

Fairplay, you’re too goddamned stupid to smell your own bullshit.  Don’t try to use Para’s words to reign me in and make me toe YOUR line.  I’m a different person than para and I post what I feel like posting.  I have no responsibility to live up to any promises para may or may not have made.

One more time: If you don’t like what *I* post, go fuck yourself.

Posted by tboy  on  03/08/2006  at  05:07 PM (Link to this comment | )

I guess your not a big fan of debate.

This is not an insult about my debating skills?

Posted by tboy  on  03/08/2006  at  05:21 PM (Link to this comment | )

OOPS. I better correct myself:

I guess your not a big fan of debate.

Is this not an insult of my debating skills?

It certainly looks like it to me. Which is where I got what I stated. So there was no spin involved Bucko!

And according to all the beat down you are getting from everyone else, it looks like you need to just back off.

Again though, Nice Try!

Posted by JimK  on  03/08/2006  at  05:31 PM (Link to this comment | )

Fairplay, I’ll concede your point on two conditions.

First off, you have to prove the first condition, which I’ll clarify in a moment.  The second condition is that if you cannot prove the first, you must concede my point that you are off base in your non-stop assault and you tried to use someone else’s words to discuss and criticize my words.

Do you agree to these terms?

Posted by Vermin  on  03/08/2006  at  05:50 PM (Link to this comment | )

Ok you need to stop taking what I say out of context.

Very well, here is what you said in its original context:

Tboy said,

If you don’t like it, then don’t post here.

Then you said,

Oh yeah if you don’t agree with the moderator your opinion isn’t welcome here.  Yeah that’s a very open minded philosophy there Tboy.  That T must stand for Tolerance eh?  I guess your not a big fan of debate.  Seriously that kind of mindset is something you see on far left kook boards I wasn’t expecting to find it here.

I don’t see how that changes the meaning in anyway. You accuse the site as a whole of trying to suppress your opinion, then imply that Tboy is intolerant because he disagrees with you.

And the reason I’m so persistent on this is cause somewhere down the line this forum lost it’s way.  It used to be about Iraqi gratitude, soldier success stories, compassion of conservatives, hypocrisy of the ultra left and so forth and so forth .  Now it’s just nothing but constant Mother Sheehan loathing and bitching.

I find it odd that you didn’t list “watching Moore” among the things that this site used to be about.  I also find it strange that you do not object to any of the topics you list above, since they are not “Moorewatching” per se. I would also point out that the story previous to this one regarded Iraq, and the one after it directly deals with expanding the degree to which the site “watches Moore’s every move.”

I realized after making my last post that I was involved in a discussion that was not relevant to the topic of the thread.  For that I apologize.  I’m done with this thread, I promise.

Posted by JimK  on  03/09/2006  at  12:30 AM (Link to this comment | )

You’re a weasel, Fairplay.  Yuur response shows everyone reading what a weasel you are.  I’ll play anyway.

Here’s the condition.  Your exact words were:

Does this mean every time you FEEL or CHOOSE to post about Sheehan, your finally going to stop bitching that you just HAVE to.

Prove that a simple majority of my Sheehan posts contain me complaining that I feel forced to post about Sheehan.  That means more than half.  Even *one* more than half.

If you can’t, please count the actual number of posts where *I*, JimK, posted about Sheehan and complained that I felt like I had to or was forced to.  Report back when you’ve finished.  If you find that you’re wrong and this is some ridiculous vendetta, I’ll accept your apology and we can move on.

Posted by Rumble  on  03/09/2006  at  01:39 PM (Link to this comment | )

I’ll accept your apology and we can move on.

Hey, JimK, you have a mis-spelling here; it is supposed to be ‘moveon.org’, not ‘move on’.

Ok, ok, it is a pathetic joke but considering the type of day that I am having at work, it is the best I can do.

Posted by JimK  on  03/09/2006  at  05:02 PM (Link to this comment | )

Fair, you just proved to everyone what a pathetic little weasel you are.  I’ve almost NEVER complained about “having” to post about Sheehan.  Maybe once or twice.  You used the word ‘EVERY.” Because you’re a pathetic little troll who loves to start shit and blow everything out of proportion.

For the absolute last fucking time: You do not get to dictate what I post here on my site, and if you do not like it, leave.

Start this shit again and I will make the decision for you.

Posted by tboy  on  03/09/2006  at  05:57 PM (Link to this comment | )

If so then I don’t want anything else do witih this website

Don’t let the cyber door hit you in the ass on the way out! :)

Posted by Don Miguel  on  03/09/2006  at  09:19 PM (Link to this comment | )

Don’t let the cyber door hit you in the ass on the way out!

LOL! Thanks, TBoy.  That’s a great line I’ll have to remember for future use.

Posted by Chris Oakley  on  03/09/2006  at  11:01 PM (Link to this comment | )

Everything always seems to come back to the Jews with Cindy.
There something she’s not telling us?

Posted by JimK  on  03/09/2006  at  11:48 PM (Link to this comment | )

Oh Fairplay, you arrogant little liar.  Your own words betrayed your bullshit.

See ya.  You were fun while you lasted.  Oh, and thanks for making my prediction come true.  I can always count on idiots like you to fulfill the required lefty bullshit hate posts in any given thread.

Posted by Buzzion  on  03/09/2006  at  11:50 PM (Link to this comment | )

Fairplay you really need to lay off the crack.

Posted by yngcelt  on  03/10/2006  at  01:46 PM (Link to this comment | )

Everything always seems to come back to the Jews with Cindy.
There something she’s not telling us?

In the past few months, Cindy has been making accusations that the war in Iraq is part of a vast conspiracy involving the nation of Israel and that Bush is in cahoots with the Jews in trying to take over the world by controlling the oil in the middle east.
Funny isn’t it?  Leftist Liberal Lemmings love calling Bush “Hitler” while they also accuse him of being a conspirator with the Jews.

Posted by Rann Aridorn  on  03/10/2006  at  08:55 PM (Link to this comment | )

Yeah, sometimes you have to wonder if the whole “Bush is worse than Hitler” thing that a lot of Libtards seem to have jumped on is because Bush ISN’T killing Jews. The Radical Left, after all, does have a strong anti-semitic faction, maybe if Bush was killing the Jewish they’d be okay with him.

Page 1 of 1 pages of comments

Post a Comment:

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

The trackback URL for this entry is:

Trackbacks:

Member Info

Hello. You will need to Login or Register to post comments.
Subscribe for updates via e-mail


Sponsors



Tip Jar

If you feel we provide a useful site, even if you just come here to disagree, please consider donating a few dollars to help keep the server going. Thank you.

Use PayPal:
Use Amazon.Com:
Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

Recent Comments

Last 30 comments

Last 60 comments

Top 5 commenters

Buzz - (1000)
w0rf - (602)
Rann Aridorn - (589)
up4debate - (493)
JimK - (454)

Most popular posts

Jim Kenefick and Moorewatch as presented by Michael Moore in Sicko (415)
It's Officially Propaganda When the Enemy Uses It!! (365)
Michael Moore, war profiteer (255)
Armed and Hoserous (248)
How the "new left" does things (232)

Search

Local Search:
Advanced Search
Google Search:

Archives

October 2008
S M T W T F S
     1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  


Complete Archives

By category


Statistics


This page has been viewed 6484879 times
Page rendered in 1.0474 seconds
70 querie(s) executed
Total Entries: 1879
Total Comments: 15051
Total Trackbacks: 162
Most Recent Entry: 10/07/2008 03:26 pm
Most Recent Comment on: 10/13/2008 12:13 am
Total Members: 3515
Total Logged in members: 3
Total guests: 47
Total anonymous users: 0
Most Recent Visitor on: 10/15/2008 11:04 pm
The most visitors ever was 2215 on 07/01/2004 06:32 pm

Current Logged-in Members:  MikeS   Sethery   ZZip