Dear Moorewatch,

I got a chance to see Michael Moore’s film about GW Bush yesterday and I decided to find out more about him. I had heard of him, but never realized how powerful he was. In my search, I found your Moorewatch site. At first I thought it was funny, with the little cartoon of him. But then I started looking through it. Your site is nothing but a magnet for hate. Your site also says that it is “Watching Michael Moore’s every move”. So, I tried to find anything I could that did that. I found nothing.

When I saw his movie about GW Bush and how he stole the election and how he is really running things, using only his friends to do his dirty work, and everything that his movie stated, I found nothing on your site proving any of it wrong. When I saw his site, he has facts documented, and he seems to really care about Amercia and it’s people. The Moorewatch site however, preaches nothing but intolerance and hate.

If you really are the site you claim to be, you should actually express that. It really proves that he is right. And your site is likely affiliated with the people that work with GW Bush. When I learned that FOX news is run by a member of the Bush family, I was shocked. But after I saw your site I am now not shocked.

Lastly, as a woman and as a mother, I am shocked to see that you are giving Cindy Sheehan so much grief, instead of supporting her. Her child died in Iraq for GW Bush and his lies. I wish GW Bush was in her shoes, with his child in Iraq and all the worry that comes with that. Luckily, my daughters are well educated and don’t need to go to war just to make a living and to support their familes. I bet you and all of your supporters don’t have any children in Iraq. If they did, they wouldn’t be a part of it. When or if you become a parent you will understand.

After reading your site and all the hate that your site exhibits, it makes me even more proud to be a liberal democrat. I am certain that now this country can see how very bad GW Bush and his friends are, and that people like you that made this site are as bad and full of hate, and we will never elect another republican ever again. Just like the end of Michael Moore’s film said: “Will they ever trust us again?” I think they no one ever will again. And I’m sure as more of your readers of you site see that film and see it’s impact you will lose your readers one by one.

To quote Michael Moore when he won his Oscar “Shame On You!”

Cary

Then, nine hours later, during which time Jim and I were both asleep, she composed the next chapter in her stream of idiocy.

Moorewatch, if you have an ounce of courage. An ounce of anything to stand for, if you have any worth to your souls at all, I challenge you to post this on your site in response to the last bit of harassment when you were notified of it. I sincerely bet you don’t. Cowards.

In 1992, just before Bush’s father was defeated by Bill Clinton, Wolfowitz wrote a blueprint to ‘set the nation’s direction for the next century’, which is now the foreign policy of George W. Bush. Entitled ‘Defence Planning Guidance’, it put an onus on the Pentagon to ‘establish and protect a new order’ under unchallenged American authority.

The US, it said, must be sure of ‘deterring potential competitors from even aspiring to a larger regional or global role’ - including Germany and Japan. It contemplated the use of nuclear, biological and chemical weaponry pre-emptively, ‘even in conflicts that do not directly engage US interests’.

Wolfowitz’s group formalised itself into a group called Project for the New American Century, which included Cheney and another old friend, former Pentagon Under-Secretary for Policy under Reagan, Richard Perle.

PLEASE NOTE THIS PART RIGHT HERE, AND I CHALLENGE YOU DRONES TO PROVE IT WRONG:
In a document two years ago, the Project pondered that what was needed to assure US global power was ‘some catastrophic and catalysing event, like a new Pearl Harbor’. The document had noted that ‘while the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides immediate justification’ for intervention, ‘the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein’.

At a graduation speech to the Military Academy at West Point, Bush last June affirmed the Wolfowitz doctrine as official policy. ‘America has, and intends to keep,’ he said, ‘military strengths beyond challenge.’

This article was from 2003.

- Cary

Then less than two hours later, she sent number three.

I thought so. You are the frauds and cowards i thought you were.

Cary

I then responded telling Cary that she was retarded, that I was at work, and when I got home I would gladly post her spewings for the entire world to mock.  This was her response.

I see it’s not posted and well, my point well proven. I’ve decided to lay my old lady discipline to work and make fools of you. Don’t worry about posting it, as I will post it in every ‘comment’ center on your site until you do.
- Cary

Again, I responded, this time saying that if she spammed our comments I would delete anything she wrote, and that she would have plenty of time to defend her paranoid ramblings once I posted her emails.  This just arrived in my email.

i decided to retype what i wrote just in case that what i typed into your website didn’t work right. so, here is what i said to you:

I might be an old lady, but I will kick your butt at this debate. I am retired and I will sit here and combat any line you give me. Mr. Stewart Hart is the only one I see as having an ounce of headway with this debate. So Mr. Hart, are you ready? I’d love to read your personal feedback on this, as you kids say, bitch!:

In 1992, just before Bush’s father was defeated by Bill Clinton, Wolfowitz wrote a blueprint to ‘set the nation’s direction for the next century’, which is now the foreign policy of George W. Bush. Entitled ‘Defence Planning Guidance’, it put an onus on the Pentagon to ‘establish and protect a new order’ under unchallenged American authority.

The US, it said, must be sure of ‘deterring potential competitors from even aspiring to a larger regional or global role’ - including Germany and Japan. It contemplated the use of nuclear, biological and chemical weaponry pre-emptively, ‘even in conflicts that do not directly engage US interests’.

Wolfowitz’s group formalised itself into a group called Project for the New American Century, which included Cheney and another old friend, former Pentagon Under-Secretary for Policy under Reagan, Richard Perle.

In a document two years ago, the Project pondered that what was needed to assure US global power was ‘some catastrophic and catalysing event, like a new Pearl Harbor’. The document had noted that ‘while the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides immediate justification’ for intervention, ‘the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein’.

At a graduation speech to the Military Academy at West Point, Bush last June affirmed the Wolfowitz doctrine as official policy. ‘America has, and intends to keep,’ he said, ‘military strengths beyond challenge.’

Posted by iCsheepPeople on 02/14 at 11:52 PM (Link to this comment)

I realized when I made this thing on your website, I forgot to say that this particular article was published in 2003. The stuff it’s talking about was in 2001. So, when you see it talking about the two years ago thing, that’s what it meant. Just in case you thought that this was an article

Okay guys, you have your orders and you know what to do.  Have fun.